» Articles » PMID: 20167952

Experienced Golfers' Perspectives on Choking Under Pressure

Overview
Specialties Orthopedics
Psychology
Date 2010 Feb 20
PMID 20167952
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although researchers have experimentally examined the mechanisms underlying pressure-induced forms of suboptimal performance, or "choking under pressure," there is a lack of research exploring the personal experience of this phenomenon. In an attempt to fill this void in the literature, this study explored experienced golfers' perceptions of the choking experience within a personal construct psychology (Kelly, 1955/1991) framework. Both male and female golfers participated in either a focus group (n = 12; all males) or one-on-one interview (n = 10; female = 7, male = 3) using experience cycle methodology (Oades & Viney, 2000) to describe their perceptions of the choking experience. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and subsequently analyzed using grounded theory analytical techniques (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). Analyses revealed five central categories representing the personal experience of choking under pressure: antecedents, personal investment, choking event, consequences, and learning experiences. The findings reported here suggest that the choking phenomenon, which can involve acute or chronic bouts of suboptimal performance (relative to the performance expectations of the athlete), is a complex process involving the interplay of several cognitive, attentional, emotional, and situational factors. Implications of the findings for a construct definition of choking are discussed, and several applied considerations are offered.

Citing Articles

Pre-movement muscle co-contraction associated with motor performance deterioration under high reward conditions.

Senta N, Ushiba J, Takemi M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16710.

PMID: 39030359 PMC: 11271558. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67630-5.


Competition Anxiety in Combat Sports and the Importance of Mental Toughness.

Mojtahedi D, Dagnall N, Denovan A, Clough P, Dewhurst S, Hillier M Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37753991 PMC: 10525228. DOI: 10.3390/bs13090713.


Test cricketers score quickly during the 'nervous nineties': Evidence from a regression discontinuity design.

Roberts L, Little D, Jackson M, Spittal M PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0287700.

PMID: 37379276 PMC: 10306206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287700.


Individual vs. Team Sport Failure-Similarities, Differences, and Current Developments.

Wergin V, Mallett C, Beckmann J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:930025.

PMID: 35814091 PMC: 9263694. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930025.


How learning unfolds in the brain: toward an optimization view.

Hennig J, Oby E, Losey D, Batista A, Yu B, Chase S Neuron. 2021; 109(23):3720-3735.

PMID: 34648749 PMC: 8639641. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.005.