» Articles » PMID: 20164268

Evaluation of Chromogenic Media for Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2010 Feb 19
PMID 20164268
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid laboratory diagnosis is critical for treating, managing, and preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We evaluated and compared the potential for MRSA detection of five chromogenic media, Brilliance MRSA agar (Oxoid), ChromID (bioMérieux), MRSASelect (Bio-Rad), CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology), and BBL-CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics). Media were tested with log serial dilutions (10(0) to 10(6) CFU) of pure isolates of MRSA (n = 60), non-MRSA (n = 27), and defined mixtures thereof simulating clinical samples (n = 84). Further evaluations were done on pre-enriched nasal and groin screening swabs (n = 213) from 165 hospitalized patients. Randomized samples were spiral plated on each medium and independently scored by five investigators for characteristic colonies at 24 and 48 h of incubation. Confirmatory testing of up to five putative MRSA colonies recovered from each medium was done. The cumulative average sensitivity with isolates, mixtures, and clinical samples was the highest for Brilliance MRSA agar (97%) and similar for the other four media (>or=92%). The cumulative average specificity was the highest for BBL-CHROMagar (99%), followed by MRSASelect (98%), CHROMagar (97%), ChromID (89%), and Brilliance MRSA agar (86%). All of the media detected MRSA at 10 and 1 CFU, although at these low loads, few MRSA samples harboring SCCmec type III or IV were misinterpreted as non-MRSA by investigators. False-positive results were mainly due to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. For an arbitrary MRSA prevalence of 5% and based on patient sample evaluations, the positive predictive values for BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar ( approximately 84%) were the highest. The negative predictive values of all of the media were >or=92% for MRSA prevalences ranging from 5% to 30%. In conclusion, BBL-CHROMagar and CHROMagar gave the best overall results for detection of MRSA, irrespective of the sample concentration, investigator, or incubation period.

Citing Articles

Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen.

Brown M, Hahn W, Bailey B, Hall A, Rodriguez G, Zahn H Viruses. 2020; 12(6).

PMID: 32545159 PMC: 7354448. DOI: 10.3390/v12060631.


Evaluation of agar culture plates to efficiently identify small colony variants of methicillin-resistant .

Watanabe Y, Oikawa N, Hariu M, Seki M Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12:1743-1748.

PMID: 31417291 PMC: 6593740. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S207057.


Efficient processing of MRSA screening specimens by a modified inoculation protocol.

Thelen P, Hornberg K, Hamprecht A Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37(10):1857-1861.

PMID: 29980897 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3319-2.


Genetic and phenotypic study of methicillin-resistant among patients and health care workers in Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt.

Elshabrawy W, Zaki M, Kamel M Iran J Microbiol. 2017; 9(2):82-88.

PMID: 29213999 PMC: 5715281.


Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Zamfir M, Adler A, Kolb S, Dammeyer A, Nasri L, Schomacher L Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017; 36(10):1819-1826.

PMID: 28474179 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5.


References
1.
Molina A, Del Campo R, Maiz L, Morosini M, Lamas A, Baquero F . High prevalence in cystic fibrosis patients of multiresistant hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST228-SCCmecI capable of biofilm formation. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 62(5):961-7. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn302. View

2.
Van Heirstraeten L, Cortinas Abrahantes J, Lammens C, Lee A, Harbarth S, Molenberghs G . Impact of a short period of pre-enrichment on detection and bacterial loads of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from screening specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(10):3326-8. PMC: 2756948. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01088-09. View

3.
Coello R, Glynn J, Gaspar C, Picazo J, Fereres J . Risk factors for developing clinical infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst hospital patients initially only colonized with MRSA. J Hosp Infect. 1997; 37(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90071-2. View

4.
Nahimana I, Francioli P, Blanc D . Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006; 12(12):1168-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01534.x. View

5.
Nonhoff C, Denis O, Brenner A, Buidin P, Legros N, Thiroux C . Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 28(4):363-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-008-0637-9. View