» Articles » PMID: 20163666

Factors Affecting Methane Production and Mitigation in Ruminants

Overview
Journal Anim Sci J
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 Feb 19
PMID 20163666
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methane (CH(4)) is the second most important greenhouse gas (GHG) and that emitted from enteric fermentation in livestock is the single largest source of emissions in Japan. Many factors influence ruminant CH(4) production, including level of intake, type and quality of feeds and environmental temperature. The objectives of this review are to identify the factors affecting CH(4) production in ruminants, to examine technologies for the mitigation of CH(4) emissions from ruminants, and to identify areas requiring further research. The following equation for CH(4) prediction was formulated using only dry matter intake (DMI) and has been adopted in Japan to estimate emissions from ruminant livestock for the National GHG Inventory Report: Y = -17.766 + 42.793X - 0.849X(2), where Y is CH(4) production (L/day) and X is DMI (kg/day). Technologies for the mitigation of CH(4) emissions from ruminants include increasing productivity by improving nutritional management, the manipulation of ruminal fermentation by changing feed composition, the addition of CH(4) inhibitors, and defaunation. Considering the importance of ruminant livestock, it is essential to establish economically feasible ways of reducing ruminant CH(4) production while improving productivity; it is therefore critical to conduct a full system analysis to select the best combination of approaches or new technologies to be applied under long-term field conditions.

Citing Articles

Enteric Methane Emission from Cattle Grazing Systems with Cover Crops and Legume-Grass Pasture.

Gere J, Restovich S, Mattera J, Cattoni M, Ortiz-Chura A, Posse G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682500 PMC: 11640361. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233535.


Sward type alters enteric methane emissions, nitrogen output and the relative abundance of the rumen microbial ecosystem in sheep.

Woodmartin S, Smith P, Creighton P, Boland T, Dunne E, McGovern F J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 39252598 PMC: 11439154. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae256.


Microencapsulation technology for delivery of enzymes in ruminant feed.

Almassri N, Trujillo F, Shiferaw Terefe N Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1352375.

PMID: 39071783 PMC: 11273329. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1352375.


Characteristics of rumen microbiota and isolates found in high propionate and low methane-producing dairy cows.

Shinkai T, Takizawa S, Enishi O, Higuchi K, Ohmori H, Mitsumori M Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1404991.

PMID: 38887715 PMC: 11180796. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1404991.


Relationship between Dairy Cow Health and Intensity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Dzermeikaite K, Kristolaityte J, Antanaitis R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539927 PMC: 10967422. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060829.