» Articles » PMID: 20161591

Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure

Overview
Journal J Mem Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Feb 18
PMID 20161591
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many theories of language production and perception assume that in the normal course of processing a word, additional non-target words (lexical neighbors) become active. The properties of these neighbors can provide insight into the structure of representations and processing mechanisms in the language processing system. To infer the properties of neighbors, we examined the non-semantic errors produced in both spoken and written word production by four individuals who suffered neurological injury. Using converging evidence from multiple language tasks, we first demonstrate that the errors originate in disruption to the processes involved in the retrieval of word form representations from long-term memory. The targets and errors produced were then examined for their similarity along a number of dimensions. A novel statistical simulation procedure was developed to determine the significance of the observed similarities between targets and errors relative to multiple chance baselines. The results reveal that in addition to position-specific form overlap (the only consistent claim of traditional definitions of neighborhood structure) the dimensions of lexical frequency, grammatical category, target length and initial segment independently contribute to the activation of non-target words in both spoken and written production. Additional analyses confirm the relevance of these dimensions for word production showing that, in both written and spoken modalities, the retrieval of a target word is facilitated by increasing neighborhood density, as defined by the results of the target-error analyses.

Citing Articles

The Devil in the Details Can Be Hard to Spot: Malapropisms and Children With Hearing Loss.

Lowenstein J, Nittrouer S Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020; 52(1):335-353.

PMID: 33112723 PMC: 8563107. DOI: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00033.


When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.

Karimi H, Diaz M Mem Cognit. 2020; 48(6):1061-1072.

PMID: 32372366 PMC: 7787263. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01042-4.


The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia: Theoretical and practical implications.

Neophytou K, Wiley R, Rapp B, Tsapkini K Neuropsychologia. 2019; 133:107157.

PMID: 31401078 PMC: 6817413. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107157.


What can errors tell us about differences between monolingual and bilingual vocabulary learning?.

Kaushanskaya M Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2019; 21(4):389-404.

PMID: 30740031 PMC: 6368092. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2016.1170760.


Investigating the mechanisms of written word production: Insights from the written blocked cyclic naming paradigm.

Breining B, Rapp B Read Writ. 2019; 32(1):65-94.

PMID: 30686861 PMC: 6342477. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-017-9742-4.


References
1.
Vitevitch M . The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Lang Speech. 1997; 40 ( Pt 3):211-28. DOI: 10.1177/002383099704000301. View

2.
Delattre M, Bonin P, Barry C . Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(6):1330-40. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1330. View

3.
Luce P, Pisoni D . Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear. 1998; 19(1):1-36. PMC: 3467695. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001. View

4.
Rapp B, Goldrick M . Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychol Rev. 2000; 107(3):460-99. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.460. View

5.
Miceli G, Capasso R . Spelling and dysgraphia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 23(1):110-34. DOI: 10.1080/02643290500202730. View