» Articles » PMID: 20158603

Efficacy and Tolerability of Peginterferon Alfa-2a or Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin in the Daily Routine Treatment of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C in Germany: the PRACTICE Study

Overview
Journal J Viral Hepat
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2010 Feb 18
PMID 20158603
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In randomized clinical trials, treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV) results in a sustained virological response (SVR) in around half of hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected and 80% of genotype 2/3-infected individuals. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon alfa-2a plus RBV compared with peginterferon alfa-2b plus RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in routine clinical practice. The intent-to-treat cohort consisted of 3414 patients treated with either peginterferon alfa-2a plus RBV (Group A) or peginterferon alfa-2b plus RBV (Group B) in 23 centres participating in the large, multicentre, observational PRACTICE study. Collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment regimen, RBV dose and outcome. Rates of early virological response, end of treatment response and SVR were 76.6%, 75.7% and 52.9% in Group A, and 70.2%, 65.6% and 50.5% in Group B, respectively. In patients matched by baseline parameters, 59.9% of patients in Group A and 55.9% in Group B achieved an SVR (P < or = 0.051). In genotype 1-infected patients matched by baseline parameters and cumulative RBV dose, SVR rates were 49.6% and 43.7% for Group A and Group B, respectively (P < or = 0.047); when matched by baseline parameters and RBV starting dose, SVR rates were 49.9% and 44.6%, respectively (P = 0.068). Overall, 21.8% of group A and 29.6% of group B patients discontinued treatment (P < or = 0.0001). The efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon plus RBV in this large cohort of patients treated in routine daily practice was similar to that in randomized clinical trials. In matched pairs analyses, more patients achieved an SVR with peginterferon alfa-2a compared with peginterferon alfa-2b.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Compliance and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon α-2a and α-2b in Adults with Chronic Hepatitis C.

Hu J, Chang M, Huang T, Yeh C, Chiu W, Chiang M J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019; 39(4):205-213.

PMID: 30855203 PMC: 6479237. DOI: 10.1089/jir.2018.0028.


A real-world intention-to-treat analysis of a decade's experience of treatment of hepatitis C with interferon-based therapies.

Selvapatt N, Brown A F1000Res. 2016; 5:2061.

PMID: 27746906 PMC: 5034792. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.9114.1.


APASL consensus statements and management algorithms for hepatitis C virus infection.

Omata M, Kanda T, Yu M, Yokosuka O, Lim S, Jafri W Hepatol Int. 2015; 6(2):409-35.

PMID: 26201405 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-012-9342-y.


Hepatitis C virus treatment in the 'real-world': how well do 'real' patients respond?.

Friedman N, Green J, Weber H, Stephen S, Lane S, Ting A J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 4(3):214-20.

PMID: 25755563 PMC: 4284209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.07.003.


Comparison of peginterferon alfa-2a and alfa-2b for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective study using the Japanese Interferon Database.

Sato I, Shimbo T, Kawasaki Y, Masaki N Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015; 9:283-90.

PMID: 25565777 PMC: 4283988. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S72245.