» Articles » PMID: 20155431

Eighty-five Redo Surgeries After 733 Laparoscopic Treatments for Ventral and Incisional Hernia: Adhesion and Recurrence Analysis

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Feb 16
PMID 20155431
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This report reviews the clinical and functional outcomes of implanted meshes during a second-look evaluation of 85 cases after a large number (733) of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repairs (LIVHR), of which 608 were controlled throughout a period of 5 to 10 years. This report demonstrates a minimal occurrence of adhesions and a low rate of recurrences and other complications related to mesh usage.

Methods: Eighty-five re-operated cases after LIVHR were reviewed retrospectively. In every redo surgery, the first trocar was always inserted on a lateral side, external to the previous skin incisions of the transabdominal fixations. Mueller's adhesion scale was used to estimate adhesion severity (Mueller 0 indicates no adhesion; Mueller I indicates adhesion of the omentum; and Mueller II indicates serosal adhesions). The mechanism of recurrence is of paramount interest and is analyzed herein. If recurrence was observed, the defect was closed and a larger mesh of Parietex was implanted under the previous one, with transparietal fixation achieved by pulling the threads with the Endoclose device.

Results: In all of our "second-look" surgeries, the neoperitoneum perfectly covered the mesh. In 47.05% of the cases, we observed no adhesions (Mueller 0), 42.3% had adhesions of the omentum (Mueller I), and 10.58% had serosal adhesions (Mueller II). There was no shrinking or wrinkling of the prosthesis in any of the cases, confirming its total peritonization on the anterior abdominal wall. Within the first 3 years, only 4.1% of the controlled patients contracted recurrences, with a mean follow-up of 52 months.

Conclusion: With the double-suturing technique used for LIVHR and the use of a composite mesh, we observed a low rate of recurrences and limited side effects as compared with the use of tacks intra-abdominally. Redo surgeries after LIVHR are feasible, but care must be taken due to unpredictable mesh adhesions.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repairs for small-sized ventral and incisional hernias: a propensity score analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients.

Chue K, Kabir T, Tan C, Tan J, Kam J, Wong W Surg Endosc. 2025; .

PMID: 40045059 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11627-2.


Polymer Hernia Repair Materials: Adapting to Patient Needs and Surgical Techniques.

Rodriguez M, Gomez-Gil V, Perez-Kohler B, Pascual G, Bellon J Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(11).

PMID: 34073902 PMC: 8197346. DOI: 10.3390/ma14112790.


Behaviour at the peritoneal interface of next-generation prosthetic materials for hernia repair.

Pascual G, Benito-Martinez S, Rodriguez M, Perez-Kohler B, Garcia-Moreno F, Bellon J Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(1):579-590.

PMID: 33507384 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08320-5.


Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic primary and incisional abdominal hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh (DynaMesh®-IPOM versus Parietex™ Composite): a single institution experience.

Domen A, Stabel C, Jawad R, Duchateau N, Fransen E, Vanclooster P Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020; 406(1):209-218.

PMID: 32504204 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01898-9.


Comparison of coated meshes for intraperitoneal placement in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu H, van Steensel S, Gielen M, Vercoulen T, Melenhorst J, Winkens B Hernia. 2019; 24(6):1253-1261.

PMID: 31659548 PMC: 7701080. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02071-y.


References
1.
Franneby U, Gunnarsson U, Wollert S, Sandblom G . Discordance between the patient's and surgeon's perception of complications following hernia surgery. Hernia. 2005; 9(2):145-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0310-x. View

2.
Carbonell A, Harold K, Mahmutovic A, Hassan R, Matthews B, Kercher K . Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am Surg. 2003; 69(8):688-91; discussion 691-2. View

3.
Balique J, Benchetrit S, Bouillot J, Flament J, Gouillat C, Jarsaillon P . Intraperitoneal treatment of incisional and umbilical hernias using an innovative composite mesh: four-year results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Hernia. 2004; 9(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0300-z. View

4.
Lermite E, Pessaux P, Tuech J, Aube C, Arnaud J . [Visceral adhesion after intraperitoneal ventral hernia treatment: monocentric study comparative of protected versus unprotected meshes]. Ann Chir. 2004; 129(9):513-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.09.004. View

5.
Chuback J, Singh R, Sills C, DICK L . Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2000; 127(4):475-6. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.104122. View