» Articles » PMID: 20150383

Joint NCCTG and NABTC Prognostic Factors Analysis for High-grade Recurrent Glioma

Overview
Journal Neuro Oncol
Specialties Neurology
Oncology
Date 2010 Feb 13
PMID 20150383
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine prognostic factors in patients with high-grade recurrent glioma for 3 outcome variables (overall survival, progression-free survival [PFS], and PFS rate 6 months after study registration [PFS6]). Data from 15 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials (n = 469, 1980-2004) and 12 North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) trials (n = 596, 1998-2002) were included. Eighteen prognostic variables were considered including type of treatment center (community/academic) and initial low-grade histology (yes/no). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Cox proportional hazards, and logistic regression models with bootstrap resampling were used to identify prognostic variables. Longer survival was associated with last known grade (Grade) of III, younger age, ECOG performance score (PS) of 0, shorter time from initial diagnosis (DxTime), and no baseline steroid use. Factors associated with longer PFS were Grade III and shorter DxTime. For patients without temozolomide as part of the treatment regimen, the only factor associated with better PFS6 was Grade III, although DxTime was important in RPA and PS was important in logistic regression. Grade was the most important prognostic factor for all three endpoints regardless of the statistical method used. Other important variables for one or more endpoints included age, PS, and DxTime. Neither type of treatment center nor initial low-grade histology was identified as a major predictor for any endpoint.

Citing Articles

Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies for glioma.

de Melo S, Elias Nunes da Silva M, Torloni M, Riera R, De Cicco K, Latorraca C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD012532.

PMID: 39777725 PMC: 11707826. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012532.pub2.


Prognostic significance of systemic inflammatory parameters in high-grade glial tumor patients: Two center experience.

Oztep Eskici S, Yilmaz E Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(16):e37726.

PMID: 38640334 PMC: 11029926. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037726.


Prognostic significance of carboxypeptidase Q and its methylation in glioblastoma.

Liu Q, Wang R, Li Z, Peng Y, Qin W, Peng X Transl Cancer Res. 2023; 12(5):1073-1087.

PMID: 37304538 PMC: 10248580. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2562.


The Current Landscape of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Alimonti P, Gonzalez Castro L Antibodies (Basel). 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 37092448 PMC: 10123751. DOI: 10.3390/antib12020027.


Valganciclovir as Add-on to Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Pantalone M, Rahbar A, Soderberg-Naucler C, Stragliotto G Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35454863 PMC: 9030820. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081958.


References
1.
Wong E, Hess K, Gleason M, Jaeckle K, Kyritsis A, PRADOS M . Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(8):2572-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2572. View

2.
Smith J, Tachibana I, Passe S, Huntley B, Borell T, Iturria N . PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93(16):1246-56. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.16.1246. View

3.
Wiencke J, Aldape K, McMillan A, Wiemels J, Moghadassi M, Miike R . Molecular features of adult glioma associated with patient race/ethnicity, age, and a polymorphism in O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14(7):1774-83. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0089. View

4.
Carson K, Grossman S, Fisher J, Shaw E . Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto the new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium phase I and II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(18):2601-6. PMC: 4118746. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1661. View