» Articles » PMID: 20149241

Mapping Main, Epistatic and Sex-specific QTL for Body Composition in a Chicken Population Divergently Selected for Low or High Growth Rate

Abstract

Background: Delineating the genetic basis of body composition is important to agriculture and medicine. In addition, the incorporation of gene-gene interactions in the statistical model provides further insight into the genetic factors that underlie body composition traits. We used Bayesian model selection to comprehensively map main, epistatic and sex-specific QTL in an F2 reciprocal intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for high or low growth rate.

Results: We identified 17 QTL with main effects across 13 chromosomes and several sex-specific and sex-antagonistic QTL for breast meat yield, thigh + drumstick yield and abdominal fatness. Different sets of QTL were found for both breast muscles [Pectoralis (P) major and P. minor], which suggests that they could be controlled by different regulatory mechanisms. Significant interactions of QTL by sex allowed detection of sex-specific and sex-antagonistic QTL for body composition and abdominal fat. We found several female-specific P. major QTL and sex-antagonistic P. minor and abdominal fatness QTL. Also, several QTL on different chromosomes interact with each other to affect body composition and abdominal fatness.

Conclusions: The detection of main effects, epistasis and sex-dimorphic QTL suggest complex genetic regulation of somatic growth. An understanding of such regulatory mechanisms is key to mapping specific genes that underlie QTL controlling somatic growth in an avian model.

Citing Articles

Effect of High Dietary Iron on Fat Deposition and Gut Microbiota in Chickens.

Yang T, Chen S, Qiu L, Guo Q, Wang Z, Jiang Y Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123780 PMC: 11310990. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152254.


Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic determinism of growth traits in a Gushi-Anka F chicken population.

Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li Y, Wu J, Wang X, Bian C Heredity (Edinb). 2020; 126(2):293-307.

PMID: 32989280 PMC: 8026619. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-00365-x.


Association of the thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 alpha gene with growth-related traits in Korean native chicken.

Cahyadi M, Park H, Seo D, Jin S, Choi N, Heo K Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020; 33(11):1755-1762.

PMID: 32106653 PMC: 7649070. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0541.


Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Growth and Carcass-Related Traits in Chickens Using a Restriction-Site Associated DNA Sequencing Method.

Ono T, Ohara K, Ishikawa A, Kouguchi T, Nagano A, Takenouchi A J Poult Sci. 2020; 56(3):166-176.

PMID: 32055211 PMC: 7005382. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0180066.


QTL Fine Mapping for Sex Determination Region in Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and Comparison with Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix).

Zhou Y, Liu H, Wang X, Fu B, Yu X, Tong J Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019; 22(1):41-53.

PMID: 31776800 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-019-09929-3.


References
1.
Segal N, Feng R, McGuire S, Allison D, Miller S . Genetic and environmental contributions to body mass index: comparative analysis of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins and same-age unrelated siblings. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008; 33(1):37-41. PMC: 3217035. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2008.228. View

2.
Broman K, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill G . R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(7):889-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112. View

3.
Ikeobi C, Woolliams J, Morrice D, Law A, Windsor D, Burt D . Quantitative trait loci affecting fatness in the chicken. Anim Genet. 2002; 33(6):428-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00911.x. View

4.
Carlborg O, Kerje S, Schutz K, Jacobsson L, Jensen P, Andersson L . A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. Genome Res. 2003; 13(3):413-21. PMC: 430275. DOI: 10.1101/gr.528003. View

5.
Park H, Jacobsson L, Wahlberg P, Siegel P, Andersson L . QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross between chicken lines divergently selected for growth. Physiol Genomics. 2006; 25(2):216-23. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00113.2005. View