» Articles » PMID: 20148348

Escalating Weekly Doses of Cetuximab and Correlation with Skin Toxicity: a Phase I Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Feb 12
PMID 20148348
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m² intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m². It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m² weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses.

Results: Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m²). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m²) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples.

Conclusions: Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m² IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m² is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.

Citing Articles

Methotrexate and Cetuximab-Biological Impact on Non-Tumorigenic Models: In Vitro and In Ovo Assessments.

Kis A, Macasoi I, Paul C, Radulescu M, Buzatu R, Watz C Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(2).

PMID: 35208492 PMC: 8877801. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020167.


Neutralization of IL-8 prevents the induction of dermatologic adverse events associated with the inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Bangsgaard N, Houtkamp M, Schuurhuis D, Parren P, Baadsgaard O, Niessen H PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e39706.

PMID: 22761877 PMC: 3382563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039706.


Monoclonal antibody therapy of pancreatic cancer with cetuximab: potential for immune modulation.

Luedke E, Jaime-Ramirez A, Bhave N, Carson 3rd W J Immunother. 2012; 35(5):367-73.

PMID: 22576341 PMC: 3353011. DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182562d76.


Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: advances and deficiencies.

De Costa A, Young M Anticancer Drugs. 2010; 22(7):674-81.

PMID: 21037467 PMC: 3124569. DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328340fd18.

References
1.
Burtness B, Goldwasser M, Flood W, Mattar B, Forastiere A . Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(34):8646-54. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4646. View

2.
Khan I, Krishnan V, Ziman M, Janatpour K, Wun T, Luciw P . A comparison of multiplex suspension array large-panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008; 76(3):159-68. PMC: 4425447. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20452. View

3.
Dei Tos A, Ellis I . Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods?. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41(10):1383-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.018. View

4.
Mendelsohn J, Baselga J . Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(14):2787-99. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.504. View

5.
Jonker D, OCallaghan C, Karapetis C, Zalcberg J, Tu D, Au H . Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(20):2040-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa071834. View