» Articles » PMID: 20148322

Increasing Financial Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 Feb 12
PMID 20148322
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We reviewed the peri-operative and financial data of patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty in our institution between 1997 and 2006. The aims were to compare difference in cost between aseptic and septic cases and to identify the sources of preventable cost increase in revision knee procedure. The study group comprised 117 women (65%) and 62 men (35%). The median age of patients decreased from 73 years (37-83 years) in 1997-2001 to 70 years (15-91 years) in 2002-2006, a decline of 4% (P < 0.05). The mean ASA scores also dropped from 3 to 2 between the two periods. Despite this, the mean total cost of revision knee procedure continued to increase. Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty because of infection had much higher (P = 0.0001) cost compared to their aseptic counterpart. Increase in the costs of investigations (P < 0.05) and implant (P < 0.05) was the major contributing factors. The cost of implants increased by 32-35% (P < 0.05) depending on implant selection. Changing demographics will increase the requirement for this surgery and thus increase its overall cost to society. Cost increases associated with unnecessary investigations, prolonged hospital stay and use of expensive implants should be avoided.

Citing Articles

The health-economic burden of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections in Europe : a comprehensive analysis following primary arthroplasty.

Szymski D, Rupp M, Fontalis A, Marais L, Walter N, Alt V Bone Jt Open. 2025; 6(3):298-311.

PMID: 40054494 PMC: 11888791. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0225.R1.


Exploring the Impact of Preoperative Laboratory Values on Short-Term Outcomes in Complex Carpal Tunnel Decompression Surgery.

Bajaj A, Khazanchi R, Shah R, Weissman J, Sadagopan N, Gosain A Adv Orthop. 2025; 2025:8494043.

PMID: 39886055 PMC: 11779986. DOI: 10.1155/aort/8494043.


Performing Revision Arthroplasty Increases Surgeon and Practice Volumes Through the Generation of Subsequent Cases: A Retrospective Study.

Amakiri I, Panton Z, Werth P, Moschetti W Arthroplast Today. 2024; 28:101385.

PMID: 38983942 PMC: 11231520. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101385.


The '2-in-1' stage: indications, technique & results.

Walmsley P Ann Jt. 2024; 7:7.

PMID: 38529137 PMC: 10929305. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-20-83.


The reimbursement system can influence the treatment choice and favor joint replacement versus other less invasive solutions in patients affected by osteoarthritis.

De Marziani L, Boffa A, Di Martino A, Andriolo L, Reale D, Bernasconi A J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):146.

PMID: 38135778 PMC: 10746689. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00699-5.


References
1.
Levine D, Cole B, Rodeo S . Cost awareness and cost containment at the Hospital for Special Surgery. Strategies and total hip replacement cost centers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (311):117-24. View

2.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E . Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 Suppl 3:144-51. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00587. View

3.
Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M . Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1487-97. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441. View

4.
Vastag B . Knee replacement underused, says panel: useful option when nonsurgical therapies fail. JAMA. 2004; 291(4):413-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.4.413. View

5.
STERN S, Singer L, Weissman S . Analysis of hospital cost in total knee arthroplasty. Does length of stay matter?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (321):36-44. View