» Articles » PMID: 20147526

The Effect of Dietary Protein on Intestinal Calcium Absorption in Rats

Overview
Journal Endocrinology
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2010 Feb 12
PMID 20147526
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increasing dietary protein intake in humans acutely increases urinary calcium. Isotopic absorption studies have indicated that, at least in the short term, this is primarily due to increased intestinal Ca absorption. To explore the mechanisms underlying dietary protein's effect on intestinal Ca absorption, female Sprague Dawley rats were fed a control (20%), low (5%), or high (40%) protein diet for 7 d, and Ca balance was measured during d 4-7. On d 7, duodenal mucosa was harvested and brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs) were prepared to evaluate Ca uptake. By d 7, urinary calcium was more than 2-fold higher in the 40% protein group compared with control (4.2 mg/d vs. 1.7 mg/d; P < 0.05). Rats consuming the 40% protein diet both absorbed and retained more Ca compared with the 5% protein group (absorption: 48.5% vs. 34.1% and retention: 45.8% vs. 33.7%, respectively; P < 0.01). Ca uptake was increased in BBMVs prepared from rats consuming the high-protein diet. Maximum velocity (V(max)) was higher in the BBMVs prepared from the high-protein group compared with those from the low-protein group (90 vs. 36 nmol Ca/mg protein x min, P < 0.001; 95% CI: 46-2486 and 14-55, respectively). The Michaelis Menten constant (K(m)) was unchanged (2.2 mm vs. 1.8 mm, respectively; P = 0.19). We conclude that in rats, as in humans, acute increases in protein intake result in hypercalciuria due to augmented intestinal Ca absorption. BBMV Ca uptake studies suggest that higher protein intake improves Ca absorption, at least in part, by increasing transcellular Ca uptake.

Citing Articles

Effect of reduced-calcium and high-calcium cheddar cheese consumption on the excretion of faecal fat: a 2-week cross-over dietary intervention study.

Feeney E, Daly A, Dunne S, Dible V, Barron R, Seratlic S Eur J Nutr. 2023; 62(4):1755-1765.

PMID: 36820883 PMC: 10195742. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03118-8.


Calcium Homeostasis and Bone Metabolism in Goats Fed a Low Protein Diet.

Mi H, Li H, Jiang W, Song W, Yan Q, He Z Front Vet Sci. 2022; 8:829872.

PMID: 35187142 PMC: 8850410. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.829872.


The relationship between protein quantity, BMD and fractures in older adults.

Curneen J, Casey M, Laird E Ir J Med Sci. 2017; 187(1):111-121.

PMID: 28674746 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-017-1642-8.


Expression of Tight Junction Proteins and Cadherin 17 in the Small Intestine of Young Goats Offered a Reduced N and/or Ca Diet.

Elfers K, Marr I, Wilkens M, Breves G, Langeheine M, Brehm R PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0154311.

PMID: 27120348 PMC: 4847856. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154311.


The acid-ash hypothesis revisited: a reassessment of the impact of dietary acidity on bone.

Nicoll R, Howard J J Bone Miner Metab. 2014; 32(5):469-75.

PMID: 24557632 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0571-0.


References
1.
Benn B, Ajibade D, Porta A, Dhawan P, Hediger M, Peng J . Active intestinal calcium transport in the absence of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 6 and calbindin-D9k. Endocrinology. 2008; 149(6):3196-205. PMC: 2408805. DOI: 10.1210/en.2007-1655. View

2.
Engelmann D, Sie T, Draper H, Bell R . Effect of a high protein intake on calcium metabolism in the rat. J Nutr. 1975; 105(4):475-83. DOI: 10.1093/jn/105.4.475. View

3.
Kerstetter J, OBrien K, Insogna K . Low protein intake: the impact on calcium and bone homeostasis in humans. J Nutr. 2003; 133(3):855S-861S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.3.855S. View

4.
Johnson N, Alcantara E, LINKSWILER H . Effect of level of protein intake on urinary and fecal calcium and calcium retention of young adult males. J Nutr. 1970; 100(12):1425-30. DOI: 10.1093/jn/100.12.1425. View

5.
Topala C, Schoeber J, Searchfield L, Riccardi D, Hoenderop J, Bindels R . Activation of the Ca2+-sensing receptor stimulates the activity of the epithelial Ca2+ channel TRPV5. Cell Calcium. 2009; 45(4):331-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2008.12.003. View