» Articles » PMID: 20140267

Novelty Encoding by the Output Neurons of the Basal Ganglia

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Feb 9
PMID 20140267
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reinforcement learning models of the basal ganglia have focused on the resemblance of the dopamine signal to the temporal difference error. However the role of the network as a whole is still elusive, in particular whether the output of the basal ganglia encodes only the behavior (actions) or it is part of the valuation process. We trained a monkey extensively on a probabilistic conditional task with seven fractal cues predicting rewarding or aversive outcomes (familiar cues). Then in each recording session we added a cue that the monkey had never seen before (new cue) and recorded from single units in the Substantia Nigra pars reticulata (SNpr) while the monkey was engaged in a task with new cues intermingled within the familiar ones. The monkey learned the association between the new cue and outcome and modified its licking and blinking behavior which became similar to responses to the familiar cues with the same outcome. However, the responses of many SNpr neurons to the new cue exceeded their response to familiar cues even after behavioral learning was completed. This dissociation between behavior and neural activity suggests that the BG output code goes beyond instruction or gating of behavior to encoding of novel cues. Thus, BG output can enable learning at the levels of its target neural networks.

Citing Articles

Curiosity: primate neural circuits for novelty and information seeking.

Monosov I Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024; 25(3):195-208.

PMID: 38263217 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00784-9.


Differences in Prediction May Underlie Language Disorder in Autism.

Weismer S, Saffran J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:897187.

PMID: 35756305 PMC: 9221834. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897187.


Encoding of eye movements explains reward-related activity in cerebellar simple spikes.

Lixenberg A, Yarkoni M, Botschko Y, Joshua M J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(2):786-799.

PMID: 31940216 PMC: 7052631. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00363.2019.


Autism as a disorder of prediction.

Sinha P, Kjelgaard M, Gandhi T, Tsourides K, Cardinaux A, Pantazis D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(42):15220-5.

PMID: 25288765 PMC: 4210351. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416797111.


Asymmetric right/left encoding of emotions in the human subthalamic nucleus.

Eitan R, Shamir R, Linetsky E, Rosenbluh O, Moshel S, Ben-Hur T Front Syst Neurosci. 2013; 7:69.

PMID: 24194703 PMC: 3810611. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00069.

References
1.
Levesque M, Parent A . The striatofugal fiber system in primates: a reevaluation of its organization based on single-axon tracing studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(33):11888-93. PMC: 1187973. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502710102. View

2.
Arkadir D, Morris G, Vaadia E, Bergman H . Independent coding of movement direction and reward prediction by single pallidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(45):10047-56. PMC: 6730185. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2583-04.2004. View

3.
Wittmann B, Daw N, Seymour B, Dolan R . Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans. Neuron. 2008; 58(6):967-73. PMC: 2535823. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.027. View

4.
Hikosaka O, WURTZ R . Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. IV. Relation of substantia nigra to superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1983; 49(5):1285-301. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1983.49.5.1285. View

5.
Tan C, Bullock D . A local circuit model of learned striatal and dopamine cell responses under probabilistic schedules of reward. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(40):10062-74. PMC: 6671259. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0259-08.2008. View