» Articles » PMID: 20135210

Community Norms, Enforcement of Minimum Legal Drinking Age Laws, Personal Beliefs and Underage Drinking: an Explanatory Model

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 Feb 6
PMID 20135210
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Strategies to enforce underage drinking laws are aimed at reducing youth access to alcohol from commercial and social sources and deterring its possession and use. However, little is known about the processes through which enforcement strategies may affect underage drinking. The purpose of the current study is to present and test a conceptual model that specifies possible direct and indirect relationships among adolescents' perception of community alcohol norms, enforcement of underage drinking laws, personal beliefs (perceived parental disapproval of alcohol use, perceived alcohol availability, perceived drinking by peers, perceived harm and personal disapproval of alcohol use), and their past-30-day alcohol use. This study used data from 17,830 middle and high school students who participated in the 2007 Oregon Health Teens Survey. Structural equations modeling indicated that perceived community disapproval of adolescents' alcohol use was directly and positively related to perceived local police enforcement of underage drinking laws. In addition, adolescents' personal beliefs appeared to mediate the relationship between perceived enforcement of underage drinking laws and past-30-day alcohol use. Enforcement of underage drinking laws appeared to partially mediate the relationship between perceived community disapproval and personal beliefs related to alcohol use. Results of this study suggests that environmental prevention efforts to reduce underage drinking should target adults' attitudes and community norms about underage drinking as well as the beliefs of youth themselves.

Citing Articles

Quantitative tools and measurements for assessing the implementation of regulatory policies in reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms: A scoping review.

Jankhotkaew J, Casswell S, Huckle T, Chaiyasong S, Phonsuk P Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022; 42(1):157-168.

PMID: 36097414 PMC: 10087297. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13543.


An Examination of Retailers' Compliance with the Minimum Legal Drinking (purchasing) Age Law in Slovenia: A Quasi-experimental Intervention Study.

Kamin T, coz S, Atanasova S Zdr Varst. 2021; 60(2):105-113.

PMID: 33822832 PMC: 8015655. DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0016.


Belief patterns and drug use in a sample of Brazilian youth: an exploratory latent class analysis.

Healy S, Martins S, Fidalgo T, Sanchez Z Braz J Psychiatry. 2020; 42(3):278-285.

PMID: 31994638 PMC: 7236161. DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0706.


Medical Marijuana Laws and Marijuana Use Among U.S. Adolescents: Evidence From Michigan Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Data.

Chen X, Yu B, Stanton B, Cook R, Chen D, Okafor C J Drug Educ. 2018; 48(1-2):18-35.

PMID: 30296851 PMC: 6551305. DOI: 10.1177/0047237918803361.


Do Associations Between Drinking Event Characteristics and Underage Drinking Differ by Drinking Location?.

Thrul J, Lipperman-Kreda S, Grube J J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018; 79(3):417-422.

PMID: 29885149 PMC: 6005261. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.417.


References
1.
Perry C, Williams C, Komro K, Veblen-Mortenson S, Forster J, Pratt L . Project Northland high school interventions: community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27(1):29-49. DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700105. View

2.
Toomey T, Wagenaar A . Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: options and research findings. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):193-205. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.193. View

3.
Dent C, Grube J, Biglan A . Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Prev Med. 2004; 40(3):355-62. PMC: 3707296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.014. View

4.
Bersamin M, Paschall M, Flewelling R . Ethnic differences in relationships between risk factors and adolescent binge drinking: a national study. Prev Sci. 2005; 6(2):127-37. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-005-3411-6. View

5.
Maxwell S, Cole D . Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychol Methods. 2007; 12(1):23-44. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23. View