» Articles » PMID: 20135121

Immunohistological Evaluation of Proprioceptive Potential of the Residual Stump of Injured Anterior Cruciate Ligaments (ACL)

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 Feb 6
PMID 20135121
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate proprioceptive potential in residual remnants, tissue harvested from ruptured ACLs in 63 consecutive patients was examined for evidence of residual proprioceptive fibres using H&E, and monoclonal antibodies to S-100 and NFP (neurofilament protein). Histological examination showed good subsynovial and intra-fascicular vascularity with free nerve endings in the majority. Morphologically normal mechanoreceptors (H&E) and proprioceptive fibres (positivity with monoclonal antibody for NFP) were found in 46% and 52.4% of stumps, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between injury duration and persistence of mechanoreceptors and proprioceptive fibres was noted. More fibres were seen where ACL remnant was adherent to PCL. Our study has shown that persistent residual proprioceptive fibres in injured ACLs (especially early cases with PCL adherence) are significant; not shaving ACL remnants may be of potential benefit during ACL reconstruction, as some re-innervation and recovery of proprioceptive potential may be possible, thus improving clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Dynamic Postural Stability in Autografts Versus Allografts Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation: A Prospective Study With 1-Year Follow-up.

Rhim H, Lee J, Lee S, Kang C, Han S, Jang K Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241303752.

PMID: 39839982 PMC: 11748150. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241303752.


Occurrence Rate of Cyclops Lesion After Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison Between Remnant Tissue Preservation and Resection Methods.

Hishimura R, Kondo E, Suzuki Y, Matsuoka M, Iwasaki K, Onodera T Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(10):23259671221130688.

PMID: 36324698 PMC: 9620259. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221130688.


Clinical outcomes in stump-preserving versus stump-sacrificing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a randomized controlled study.

El-Desouky M, Ezzat M, Abdelrazek B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):703.

PMID: 35870924 PMC: 9308271. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05665-3.


Mechanoreceptor analysis on femoral and tibial site remnant of anterior cruciate ligament injury using immunohistochemistry.

Adriansyah D, Santoso A, Sibarani T, Setyawan N Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 78:103849.

PMID: 35734679 PMC: 9207111. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103849.


Risk factors of young males with physically demanding occupations having accumulated damage of anterior cruciate ligament.

Yu W, Xianmin L, Liangbi X, Chunbao L Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(6):1109-1114.

PMID: 35478322 PMC: 9163968. DOI: 10.1111/os.13276.


References
1.
Fromm B, Kummer W . Nerve supply of anterior cruciate ligaments and of cryopreserved anterior cruciate ligament allografts: a new method for the differentiation of the nervous tissues. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994; 2(2):118-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF01476484. View

2.
Paterson F, Trickey E . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using part of the patellar tendon as a free graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68(3):453-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B3.3733814. View

3.
Schutte M, Dabezies E, Zimny M, Happel L . Neural anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(2):243-7. View

4.
Barrett D . Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5):833-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894677. View

5.
Schultz R, Miller D, Kerr C, Micheli L . Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(7):1072-6. View