» Articles » PMID: 20133876

Hemispheric Differences in Processing of Vocalizations Depend on Early Experience

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2010 Feb 6
PMID 20133876
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An intriguing phenomenon in the neurobiology of language is lateralization: the dominant role of one hemisphere in a particular function. Lateralization is not exclusive to language because lateral differences are observed in other sensory modalities, behaviors, and animal species. Despite much scientific attention, the function of lateralization, its possible dependence on experience, and the functional implications of such dependence have yet to be clearly determined. We have explored the role of early experience in the development of lateralized sensory processing in the brain, using the songbird model of vocal learning. By controlling exposure to natural vocalizations (through isolation, song tutoring, and muting), we manipulated the postnatal auditory environment of developing zebra finches, and then assessed effects on hemispheric specialization for communication sounds in adulthood. Using bilateral multielectrode recordings from a forebrain auditory area known to selectively process species-specific vocalizations, we found that auditory responses to species-typical songs and long calls, in both male and female birds, were stronger in the right hemisphere than in the left, and that right-side responses adapted more rapidly to stimulus repetition. We describe specific instances, particularly in males, where these lateral differences show an influence of auditory experience with song and/or the bird's own voice during development.

Citing Articles

Novel sound exposure drives dynamic changes in auditory lateralization that are associated with perceptual learning in zebra finches.

Furest Cataldo B, Yang L, Cabezas B, Ovetsky J, Vicario D Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1205.

PMID: 38012325 PMC: 10681987. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05567-7.


Hemispheric and Sex Differences in Mustached Bat Primary Auditory Cortex Revealed by Neural Responses to Slow Frequency Modulations.

Washington S, Pritchett D, Keliris G, Kanwal J Symmetry (Basel). 2021; 13(6).

PMID: 34513031 PMC: 8428785. DOI: 10.3390/sym13061037.


Life-Stage Dependent Plasticity in the Auditory System of a Songbird Is Signal and Emitter-Specific.

Adreani N, DAmelio P, Gahr M, Ter Maat A Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:588672.

PMID: 33343284 PMC: 7746620. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.588672.


Early Auditory Experience Modifies Neuronal Firing Properties in the Zebra Finch Auditory Cortex.

Kudo T, Morohashi Y, Yazaki-Sugiyama Y Front Neural Circuits. 2020; 14:570174.

PMID: 33132855 PMC: 7578418. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2020.570174.


Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Talkington W, Donai J, Kadner A, Layne M, Forino A, Wen S J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(10):3539-3559.

PMID: 32936717 PMC: 8060013. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00063.


References
1.
Terleph T, Mello C, Vicario D . Species differences in auditory processing dynamics in songbird auditory telencephalon. Dev Neurobiol. 2007; 67(11):1498-510. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20524. View

2.
Muller C, Leppelsack H . Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain. Exp Brain Res. 1985; 59(3):587-99. DOI: 10.1007/BF00261351. View

3.
Poirier C, Boumans T, Verhoye M, Balthazart J, Van Der Linden A . Own-song recognition in the songbird auditory pathway: selectivity and lateralization. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(7):2252-8. PMC: 2677151. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4650-08.2009. View

4.
Williams H, Crane L, Hale T, Esposito M, Nottebohm F . Right-side dominance for song control in the zebra finch. J Neurobiol. 1992; 23(8):1006-20. DOI: 10.1002/neu.480230807. View

5.
Petersen M, Beecher M, Zoloth S, Green S, Marler P, Moody D . Neural lateralization of vocalizations by Japanese macaques: communicative significance is more important than acoustic structure. Behav Neurosci. 1984; 98(5):779-90. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.98.5.779. View