» Articles » PMID: 20126519

Cerebellar and Extracerebellar Involvement in Mouse Eyeblink Conditioning: the ACDC Model

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20126519
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past decade the advent of mouse transgenics has generated new perspectives on the study of cerebellar molecular mechanisms that are essential for eyeblink conditioning. However, it also appears that results from eyeblink conditioning experiments done in mice differ in some aspects from results previously obtained in other mammals. In this review article we will, based on studies using (cell-specific) mouse mutants and region-specific lesions, re-examine the general eyeblink behavior in mice and the neuro-anatomical circuits that might contribute to the different peaks in the conditioned eyeblink trace. We conclude that the learning process in mice has at least two stages: An early stage, which includes short-latency responses that are at least partly controlled by extracerebellar structures such as the amygdala, and a later stage, which is represented by well-timed conditioned responses that are mainly controlled by the pontocerebellar and olivocerebellar systems. We refer to this overall concept as the Amygdala-Cerebellum-Dynamic-Conditioning Model (ACDC model).

Citing Articles

Discrimination training affects stimulus generalization in mice during Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning.

Fiocchi F, van Dorp N, Dijkhuizen S, van den Berg M, Wong A, De Zeeuw C Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1446991.

PMID: 39247713 PMC: 11377223. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1446991.


The Role of Cerebellar Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability, Synaptic Plasticity, and Perineuronal Nets in Eyeblink Conditioning.

Schreurs B, ODell D, Wang D Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38534469 PMC: 10968667. DOI: 10.3390/biology13030200.


Impact of enriched environment on motor performance and learning in mice.

Dijkhuizen S, Van Ginneken L, IJpelaar A, Koekkoek S, de Zeeuw C, Boele H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5962.

PMID: 38472324 PMC: 10933351. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56568-3.


Delay eyeblink conditioning performance and brain-wide c-Fos expression in male and female mice.

Oyaga M, Serra I, Kurup D, Koekkoek S, Badura A Open Biol. 2023; 13(5):220121.

PMID: 37161289 PMC: 10170203. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220121.


Role of cerebellum in sleep-dependent memory processes.

Jackson A, Xu W Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 17:1154489.

PMID: 37143709 PMC: 10151545. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1154489.


References
1.
Pilz P, Caeser M, Ostwald J . Comparative threshold studies of the acoustic pinna, jaw and startle reflex in the rat. Physiol Behav. 1988; 43(4):411-5. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90112-6. View

2.
Smith D, Gallagher M, Stanton M . Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning. Learn Mem. 2007; 14(9):597-605. PMC: 1994077. DOI: 10.1101/lm.614807. View

3.
Qiao X, Chen L, Gao H, Bao S, Hefti F, Thompson R . Cerebellar brain-derived neurotrophic factor-TrkB defect associated with impairment of eyeblink conditioning in Stargazer mutant mice. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(17):6990-9. PMC: 6792950. View

4.
Yeo C, Hardiman M, Glickstein M . Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. III. Connections of cerebellar lobule HVI. Exp Brain Res. 1985; 60(1):114-26. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237024. View

5.
Sacchetti B, Scelfo B, Strata P . The cerebellum: synaptic changes and fear conditioning. Neuroscientist. 2005; 11(3):217-27. DOI: 10.1177/1073858405276428. View