» Articles » PMID: 20126290

Onsets and Codas in 1.5-year-olds' Word Recognition

Overview
Journal J Mem Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20126290
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous tests of toddlers' phonological knowledge of familiar words using word recognition tasks have examined syllable onsets but not word-final consonants (codas). However, there are good reasons to suppose that children's knowledge of coda consonants might be less complete than their knowledge of onset consonants. To test this hypothesis, the present study examined 14- to 21-month-old children's knowledge of the phonological forms of familiar words by measuring their comprehension of correctly-pronounced and mispronounced instances of those words using a visual fixation task. Mispronunciations substituted onset or coda consonants. Adults were tested in the same task for comparison with children. Children and adults fixated named targets more upon hearing correct pronunciations than upon hearing mispronunciations, whether those mispronunciations involved the word's initial or final consonant. In addition, detailed analysis of the timing of adults' and children's eye movements provided clear evidence for incremental interpretation of the speech signal. Children's responses were slower and less accurate overall, but children and adults showed nearly identical temporal effects of the placement of phonological substitutions. The results demonstrate accurate encoding of consonants even in words children cannot yet say.

Citing Articles

Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children's lexical processing.

Levari T, Snedeker J J Mem Lang. 2024; 137.

PMID: 38855737 PMC: 11160963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512.


Questioning the role of lexical contrastiveness in phonological development: Converging evidence from perception and production studies.

Rose Y, Blackmore S Can J Linguist. 2022; 63(4):580-608.

PMID: 35179525 PMC: 8849088. DOI: 10.1017/cnj.2018.12.


The Influence of Different Prosodic Cues on Word Segmentation.

Matzinger T, Ritt N, Fitch W Front Psychol. 2021; 12:622042.

PMID: 33796045 PMC: 8007974. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622042.


The development of infants' responses to mispronunciations: A meta-analysis.

Von Holzen K, Bergmann C Dev Psychol. 2020; 57(1):1-18.

PMID: 33382325 PMC: 8281368. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001141.


Infants' discrimination of consonant contrasts in the presence and absence of talker variability.

Quam C, Clough L, Knight S, Gerken L Infancy. 2020; 26(1):84-103.

PMID: 33063948 PMC: 9794002. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12371.


References
1.
Mirman D, Dixon J, Magnuson J . Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. J Mem Lang. 2008; 59(4):475-494. PMC: 2593828. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006. View

2.
Magnuson J, Tanenhaus M, Aslin R, Dahan D . The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(2):202-27. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202. View

3.
Swingley D . Lexical exposure and word-form encoding in 1.5-year-olds. Dev Psychol. 2007; 43(2):454-64. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.454. View

4.
Brent M, Siskind J . The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition. 2001; 81(2):B33-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00122-6. View

5.
Dahan D, Tanenhaus M . Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 12(3):453-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193787. View