» Articles » PMID: 20121873

The Role of Landmarks and Boundaries in the Development of Spatial Memory

Overview
Journal Dev Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20121873
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been suggested that learning an object's location relative to (1) intramaze landmarks and (2) local boundaries is supported by parallel striatal and hippocampal systems, both of which rely upon input from a third system for orientation. However, little is known about the developmental trajectories of these systems' contributions to spatial learning. The present study tested 5- and 7-year-old children and adults on a water maze-like task in which all three types of cue were available. Participants had to remember the location of an object hidden in a circular bounded environment containing a moveable intramaze landmark and surrounded by distal cues. Children performed less accurately than adults, and showed a different pattern of error. While adults relied most on the stable cue provided by the boundary, children relied on both landmark and boundary cues similarly, suggesting a developmental increase in the weighting given to boundary cues. Further, adults were most accurate in coding angular information (dependent on distal cues), whereas children were most accurate in coding distance, suggesting a developing ability to use distal cues to orient. These results indicate that children as young as 5 years use boundary, intramaze landmark, and distal visual cues in parallel, but that the basic accuracy and relative weighting of these cues changes during subsequent development.

Citing Articles

Environment geometry alters subiculum boundary vector cell receptive fields in adulthood and early development.

Muessig L, Ribeiro Rodrigues F, Bjerknes T, Towse B, Barry C, Burgess N Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):982.

PMID: 38302455 PMC: 10834499. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45098-1.


Could an Immersive Virtual Reality Training Improve Navigation Skills in Children with Cerebral Palsy? A Pilot Controlled Study.

Nossa R, Gagliardi C, Panzeri D, Diella E, Maghini C, Genova C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36294467 PMC: 9604863. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206146.


Selective neural coding of object, feature, and geometry spatial cues in humans.

Ramanoel S, Durteste M, Bizeul A, Ozier-Lafontaine A, Becu M, Sahel J Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(17):5281-5295.

PMID: 35776524 PMC: 9812241. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26002.


Differential prioritization of intramaze cue and boundary information during spatial navigation across the human lifespan.

Glockner F, Schuck N, Li S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15257.

PMID: 34315933 PMC: 8316315. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94530-9.


Time and distance estimation in children using an egocentric navigation task.

Thurley K, Schild U Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):18001.

PMID: 30573744 PMC: 6302095. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36234-1.