» Articles » PMID: 20121747

Increasing Lung Allocation Scores Predict Worsened Survival Among Lung Transplant Recipients

Overview
Journal Am J Transplant
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 Feb 4
PMID 20121747
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implemented in 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) aims to distribute donor organs based on overall survival benefits for all potential recipients, rather than on waiting list time accrued. While prior work has shown that patients with scores greater than 46 are at increased risk of death, it is not known whether that risk is equivalent among such patients when stratified by LAS score and diagnosis. We retrospectively evaluated 5331 adult lung transplant recipients from May 2005 to February 2009 to determine the association of LAS (groups based on scores of < or =46, 47-59, 60-79 and > or =80) and posttransplant survival. When compared with patients with LAS < or = 46, only those with LAS > or = 60 had an increased risk of death (LAS 60-79: hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.90; LAS > or = 80: HR, 2.03; CI, 1.61-2.55; p < 0.001) despite shorter median waiting list times. This risk persisted after adjusting for age, diagnosis, transplant center volume and donor characteristics. By specific diagnosis, an increased hazard was observed in patients with COPD with LAS > or = 80, as well as those with IPF with LAS > or = 60.

Citing Articles

Development of a Machine Learning-Powered Optimized Lung Allocation System for Maximum Benefits in Lung Transplantation: A Korean National Data.

Ha M, Cho W, So M, Lee D, Kim Y, Yeo H J Korean Med Sci. 2025; 40(7):e18.

PMID: 39995255 PMC: 11858608. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e18.


Lung Transplant Success in COVID-19 Patients Requiring V-V ECMO: One-Year Follow-Up.

Odish M, Pollema T, Lin C, Owens R, Yi C, LeBlanc S Ann Transplant. 2024; 29:e946088.

PMID: 39716460 PMC: 11684344. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.946088.


Experience of a novel lung transplant program in Mexico.

Zavala-Gomez M, Rodriguez-de la Garza P, Chavarria-Martinez U, Wong-Jaen M, Camacho-Ortiz A, Rizo-Topete L Front Transplant. 2024; 3:1347603.

PMID: 39108633 PMC: 11300286. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1347603.


Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.

Yang Z, Bai Y, Yan Y, Hachem R, Witt C, Vazquez Guillamet R Am J Transplant. 2024; 24(7):1279-1288.

PMID: 38531429 PMC: 11254565. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032.


Disturbed sleep after lung transplantation is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

Prather A, Gao Y, Betancourt L, Kordahl R, Sriram A, Huang C medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37873197 PMC: 10593057. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.12.23296973.


References
1.
Axelrod D, Guidinger M, McCullough K, Leichtman A, Punch J, Merion R . Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4(6):920-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00462.x. View

2.
Merlo C, Weiss E, Orens J, Borja M, Diener-West M, Conte J . Impact of U.S. Lung Allocation Score on survival after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28(8):769-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.04.024. View

3.
Kozower B, Meyers B, Smith M, De Oliveira N, Cassivi S, Guthrie T . The impact of the lung allocation score on short-term transplantation outcomes: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135(1):166-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.044. View

4.
Chen H, Shiboski S, Golden J, Gould M, Hays S, Hoopes C . Impact of the lung allocation score on lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 180(5):468-74. PMC: 2742763. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1603OC. View

5.
Christie J, Edwards L, Aurora P, Dobbels F, Kirk R, Rahmel A . Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult lung and heart/lung transplantation report--2008. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27(9):957-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.07.018. View