Methodological Issues in the Use of Peer Sociometric Nominations with Middle School Youth

Overview

Journal Soc Dev

Date 2010 Feb 2

PMID 20119492

Citations 17

Authors

Francois Poulin

Thomas J Dishion

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Studies reporting sociometric assessments based on nominations have been characterized by important methodological inconsistencies when conducted in the middle school context. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the possibility of a response bias when participants are provided with a long roster sorted alphabetically, (2) the impact of including or not other-sex peers in the voting population, and (3) the impact of including or not all the grademates in the voting population. Participants were 664 sixth graders from three middle schools. Peer nominations for sociometric items (i.e., like most and like least), as well as teacher ratings of antisocial behavior and records of academic performance, were collected. A sequence effect in peer nominations was found, suggesting that students whose names were listed higher on the rosters received more nominations than did students whose names were listed lower on the list. Moreover, results indicated that the nominations received from the other-sex grademates and from the grademates outside the classroom improved the predictive validity of the sociometric measure. The implications of these results for the use of sociometric assessment in middle schools are discussed.

Citing Articles

Relational and interactional dynamic network data from Czech lower-secondary school students.

Lintner T, Sedova K, Sedlacek M, Salamounova Z, Svaricek R, Malikova K Data Brief. 2023; 51:109641.

PMID: 37854344 PMC: 10579281. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109641.

Name order effects in measuring adolescent social networks using rosters.

Liu S, Nolin D, Kitts J Soc Networks. 2023; 76:68-78.

PMID: 37840904 PMC: 10569157. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.07.002.

Development of a sociometric web application to study the relationship among secondary school learners.

Suraseth C, Koraneekij P Heliyon. 2022; 8(8):e10105.

PMID: 35991989 PMC: 9382275. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10105.

Peer Status as a Potential Risk or Protective Factor: A Latent Profile Analysis on Peer Status and Its Association with Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescents with and without Parental Physical Abuse Experience.

Favre C, Aksoy D, Janousch C, Garrote A Children (Basel). 2022; 9(5).

PMID: 35626776 PMC: 9139603. DOI: 10.3390/children9050599.

The Role of Aggressive Peer Norms in Elementary School Children's Perceptions of Classroom Peer Climate and School Adjustment.

Laninga-Wijnen L, van den Berg Y, Mainhard T, Cillessen A J Youth Adolesc. 2021; 50(8):1582-1600.

PMID: 33864568 PMC: 8270866. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-021-01432-0.

References

Hatzichristou C, Hopf D . A multiperspective comparison of peer sociometric status groups in childhood and adolescence. Child Dev. 1996; 67(3):1085-102. View

Rose A, Swenson L, Waller E . Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Dev Psychol. 2004; 40(3):378-87. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378. View

Pekarik E, Prinz R, Liebert D, Weintraub S, Neale J . The Pupil Evaluation Inventory. A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976; 4(1):83-97. DOI: 10.1007/BF00917607. View

Kiesner J, Pastore M . Differences in the relations between antisocial behavior and peer acceptance across contexts and across adolescence. Child Dev. 2005; 76(6):1278-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00850.x. View

Wentzel K, Caldwell K . Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Dev. 1998; 68(6):1198-209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x. View

Achenbach T, McConaughy S, Howell C . Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull. 1987; 101(2):213-32. View

Stormshak E, Bierman K, Bruschi C, Dodge K, Coie J . The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Child Dev. 1999; 70(1):169-82. PMC: 2761650. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00013. View

Schwartz D, Gorman A, Nakamoto J, McKay T . Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: links with academic performance and school attendance. Dev Psychol. 2006; 42(6):1116-27. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116. View

Inderbitzen H, Walters K, Bukowski A . The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. J Clin Child Psychol. 1998; 26(4):338-48. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2604_2. View

10.

Borelli J, Prinstein M . Reciprocal, longitudinal associations among adolescents' negative feedback-seeking, depressive symptoms, and peer relations. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006; 34(2):159-69. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-005-9010-y. View

11.

Franzoi S, Davis M . Two social worlds: social correlates and stability of adolescent status groups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 67(3):462-73. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.3.462. View

12.

Wentzel K . Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Dev. 1991; 62(5):1066-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01589.x. View

13.

Boivin M, Dodge K, Coie J . Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: the social misfit revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 69(2):269-79. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.269. View

14.

Wang S, Houshyar S, Prinstein M . Adolescent girls' and boys' weight-related health behaviors and cognitions: associations with reputation- and preference-based peer status. Health Psychol. 2006; 25(5):658-63. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.658. View

15.

Cillessen A, Mayeux L . From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Dev. 2004; 75(1):147-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x. View

16.

Prinstein M, Wargo Aikins J . Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2004; 32(2):147-58. PMC: 4165605. DOI: 10.1023/b:jacp.0000019767.55592.63. View