Molecular Indicators Used in the Development of Predictive Models for Microbial Source Tracking

Overview

Journal Appl Environ Microbiol

Specialties Environmental Health
Microbiology

Date 2010 Feb 2

PMID 20118380

Citations 18

Authors

Elisenda Balleste

Xavier Bonjoch

Lluis A Belanche

Anicet R Blanch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A number of chemical, microbial, and eukaryotic indicators have been proposed as indicators of fecal pollution sources in water bodies. No single one of the indicators tested to date has been able to determine the source of fecal pollution in water. However, the combined use of different indicators has been demonstrated to be the best way of defining predictive models suitable for determining fecal pollution sources. Molecular methods are promising tools that could complement standard microbiological water analysis. In this study, the feasibility of some proposed molecular indicators for microbial source tracking (MST) was compared (names of markers are in parentheses): host-specific Bacteroidetes (HF134, HF183, CF128, and CF193), Bifidobacterium adolescentis (ADO), Bifidobacterium dentium (DEN), the gene esp of Enterococcus faecium, and host-specific mitochondrial DNA associated with humans, cattle, and pigs (Humito, Bomito, and Pomito, respectively). None of the individual molecular markers tested enabled 100% source identification. They should be combined with other markers to raise sensitivity and specificity and increase the number of sources that are identified. MST predictive models using only these molecular markers were developed. The models were evaluated by considering the lowest number of molecular indicators needed to obtain the highest rate of identification of fecal sources. The combined use of three molecular markers (ADO, Bomito, and Pomito) enabled correct identification of 75.7% of the samples, with differentiation between human, swine, bovine, and poultry sources. Discrimination between human and nonhuman fecal pollution was possible using two markers: ADO and Pomito (84.6% correct identification). The percentage of correct identification increased with the number of markers analyzed. The best predictive model for distinguishing human from nonhuman fecal sources was based on 5 molecular markers (HF134, ADO, DEN, Bomito, and Pomito) and provided 90.1% correct classification.

Citing Articles

Origin of fecal contamination in lettuce and strawberries: From microbial indicators, molecular markers, and .

Vesga F, Venegas C, Florez Martinez V, Sanchez-Alfonso A, Trespalacios A Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36526.

PMID: 39263095 PMC: 11387255. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36526.

Source tracking of fecal contamination in Asian green mussels () harvested in Manila Bay, Philippines by molecular detection and genotyping of spp.

Vejano M, Dela Pena L, Rivera W J Parasit Dis. 2024; 48(1):5-13.

PMID: 38440756 PMC: 10908986. DOI: 10.1007/s12639-023-01634-2.

An overview of molecular markers for identification of non-human fecal pollution sources.

Zlender T, Rupnik M Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1256174.

PMID: 38075863 PMC: 10701406. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256174.

Characterization of Stormwater Runoff Based on Microbial Source Tracking Methods.

Monteiro S, Queiroz G, Ferreira F, Santos R Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:674047.

PMID: 34177858 PMC: 8222924. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.674047.

Shared bacterial communities between soil, stored drinking water, and hands in rural Bangladeshi households.

Fuhrmeister E, Ercumen A, Grembi J, Islam M, Pickering A, Nelson K Water Res X. 2020; 9:100056.

PMID: 32529181 PMC: 7276488. DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100056.

References

Martellini A, Payment P, Villemur R . Use of eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA to differentiate human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources in fecally contaminated surface water. Water Res. 2005; 39(4):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.012. View

Caldwell J, Raley M, Levine J . Mitochondrial multiplex real-time PCR as a source tracking method in fecal-contaminated effluents. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(9):3277-83. DOI: 10.1021/es062912s. View

Hammerum A, Jensen L . Prevalence of esp, encoding the enterococcal surface protein, in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from hospital patients, poultry, and pigs in Denmark. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(11):4396. PMC: 139711. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4396.2002. View

Yampara-Iquise H, Zheng G, Jones J, Andrew Carson C . Use of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-specific alpha-1-6, mannanase quantitative PCR to detect human faecal pollution in water. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 105(5):1686-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03895.x. View

Meays C, Broersma K, Nordin R, Mazumder A . Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods. J Environ Manage. 2004; 73(1):71-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.001. View

Stoeckel D, Harwood V . Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(8):2405-15. PMC: 1855604. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02473-06. View

Kreader C . Design and evaluation of Bacteroides DNA probes for the specific detection of human fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(4):1171-9. PMC: 167373. DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1171-1179.1995. View

Field K, Chern E, Dick L, Fuhrman J, Griffith J, Holden P . A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking. J Water Health. 2004; 1(4):181-94. View

Satokari R, Vaughan E, Akkermans A, Saarela M, de Vos W . Bifidobacterial diversity in human feces detected by genus-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67(2):504-13. PMC: 92614. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.504-513.2001. View

10.

Ahmed W, Stewart J, Gardner T, Powell D, Brooks P, Sullivan D . Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments. Water Res. 2007; 41(16):3771-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.051. View

11.

Lynch P, Gilpin B, Sinton L, Savill M . The detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis by colony hybridization as an indicator of human faecal pollution. J Appl Microbiol. 2002; 92(3):526-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01557.x. View

12.

Bernhard A, Field K . Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(4):1587-94. PMC: 92027. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1587-1594.2000. View

13.

Bonjoch X, Balleste E, Blanch A . Enumeration of bifidobacterial populations with selective media to determine the source of waterborne fecal pollution. Water Res. 2005; 39(8):1621-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.018. View

14.

Kildare B, Leutenegger C, McSwain B, Bambic D, Rajal V, Wuertz S . 16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach. Water Res. 2007; 41(16):3701-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037. View

15.

Andrew Carson C, Christiansen J, Yampara-Iquise H, Benson V, Baffaut C, Davis J . Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(8):4945-9. PMC: 1183297. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4945-4949.2005. View

16.

Gilpin B, James T, Nourozi F, Saunders D, Scholes P, Savill M . The use of chemical and molecular microbial indicators for faecal source identification. Water Sci Technol. 2003; 47(3):39-43. View

17.

Mieszkin S, Furet J, Corthier G, Gourmelon M . Estimation of pig fecal contamination in a river catchment by real-time PCR using two pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(10):3045-54. PMC: 2681621. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02343-08. View

18.

Griffith J, Weisberg S, McGee C . Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples. J Water Health. 2004; 1(4):141-51. View

19.

Khatib L, Tsai Y, Olson B . A biomarker for the identification of cattle fecal pollution in water using the LTIIa toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002; 59(1):97-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-002-0959-y. View

20.

Baker-Austin C, Morris J, Lowther J, Rangdale R, Lees D . Rapid identification and differentiation of agricultural faecal contamination sources using multiplex PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009; 49(4):529-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02679.x. View