» Articles » PMID: 20113741

Preconscious Processing Biases Predict Emotional Reactivity to Stress

Overview
Journal Biol Psychiatry
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Feb 2
PMID 20113741
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anxiety vulnerability is associated with biases in attention: a tendency to selectively process negative relative to neutral or positive information. It is not clear whether this bias is: 1) related to the physiological response to stressful events, and 2) causally related to the development of anxiety disorders.

Methods: We tested the predictive value of both preconscious and conscious attention biases in a prospective study of stress reactivity in a nonclinical sample. One hundred four male participants were assessed at baseline and then again 4 months (n = 82) and 8 months later (n = 70). Salivary cortisol and self-report measures were obtained at the baseline testing session in addition to measures of biased attention. Subsequent emotional reactivity was assessed by means of salivary cortisol and self-reported state-anxiety responses during a laboratory-based stressor (4 months later) as well as during a real-life stressor 8 months later (i.e., examination period).

Results: Regression analyses indicated that a preconscious negative processing bias was the best predictor of the cortisol response to stressful events. Importantly, a measure of selective processing provided a better indicator of subsequent emotional reactivity than self-report measures of neuroticism, trait-anxiety, and extraversion.

Conclusions: These results suggest that preconscious biases toward negative material play a causal role in heightened anxiety vulnerability. Our results illustrate the potential utility of preconscious biases in attention in providing an early marker of anxiety vulnerability and a potential target for treatment intervention.

Citing Articles

Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Lamontagne S, Zabala P, Zarate Jr C, Ballard E Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 153:105361.

PMID: 37595649 PMC: 10592047. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105361.


Fitness Dance Counteracts Female Ph.D. Candidates' Stress by Affecting Emotion Regulation.

Liu D, Sun F, Zhu Y, Jia C, Mao Y, Liu B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429345 PMC: 9690972. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214627.


A hypothetic model for examining the relationship between happiness, forgiveness, emotional reactivity and emotional security.

Ercengiz M, Safali S, Kaya A, Turan M Curr Psychol. 2022; :1-15.

PMID: 35370385 PMC: 8960667. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-02909-2.


Feelings of fear, sadness, and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from two studies in the UK.

Ypsilanti A, Mullings E, Hawkins O, Lazuras L J Affect Disord. 2021; 295:1012-1023.

PMID: 34706409 PMC: 8407941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.031.


Functions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion regulation under stress.

Suzuki Y, Tanaka S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18225.

PMID: 34521947 PMC: 8440524. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97751-0.


References
1.
Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, ERBAUGH J . An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-71. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. View

2.
Dandeneau S, Baldwin M, Baccus J, Sakellaropoulo M, Pruessner J . Cutting stress off at the pass: reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 93(4):651-66. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.651. View

3.
van den Hout M, Tenney N, Huygens K, Merckelbach H, Kindt M . Responding to subliminal threat cues is related to trait anxiety and emotional vulnerability: a successful replication of Macleod and Hagan (1992). Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(4):451-4. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00062-o. View

4.
Mattia J, Heimberg R, Hope D . The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics. Behav Res Ther. 1993; 31(3):305-13. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90029-t. View

5.
Nay W, Thorpe G, Roberson-Nay R, Hecker J, Sigmon S . Attentional bias to threat and emotional response to biological challenge. J Anxiety Disord. 2004; 18(5):609-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2003.08.003. View