» Articles » PMID: 20112118

Comparison of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic-assisted Hemicolectomy

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Jan 30
PMID 20112118
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection has been shown to result in earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative pain, decreased length of stay, and decreased morbidity when compared to open resection. Laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy often still involves externalization of the bowel for resection and anastomosis. The aim of this study was to determine short-term outcomes of performing intra- versus extracorporeal resection and anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of 105 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy or colectomy by a single surgeon from January 2006 through August 2008 was performed. Pearson chi(2) and Student's t test were used to test for significance.

Results: There were 105 patients in total who underwent laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection (66), right hemicolectomy (29), left hemicolectomy (9), and subtotal colectomy (1). There were more males in the extracorporeal group, but patients in the two groups were otherwise demographically comparable. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 54 patients and extracorporeal in 51 patients. The operation was longer in the intracorporeal group (p <or= 0.001), but estimated blood loss was less (p = 0.014). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in time to bowel movement between the intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis groups; however, there was earlier return of flatus (2 vs. 2.4 days, respectively; p = 0.017). Postoperative narcotic use (16 vs. 49 mg morphine equivalents; p = 0.001), length of stay (3.2 vs. 3.8 days; p = 0.012), and perioperative morbidity (6 vs. 15 patients; p = 0.019) were all decreased in the intra- versus extracorporeal group, respectively. There was no perioperative mortality.

Conclusion: In comparison to the extracorporeal technique, resection and creation of the anastomosis intracorporeally produces superior results with earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative narcotic use, and decreased length of stay and morbidity. Further studies will be needed to verify our findings.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted ileo-caecal resection with intracorporeal anastomosis in children with Crohn disease: initial experience of a paediatric center and surgical feasibility.

Wong M, Rotondi G, Avanzini S, Arrigo S, Mattioli G Pediatr Surg Int. 2025; 41(1):68.

PMID: 39831981 PMC: 11753335. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05961-0.


Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Hiraki M, Yanagisawa K, Ikeshima R, Hata T, Komura K, Arita A BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):249.

PMID: 39237904 PMC: 11375873. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02551-8.


Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Colo-colic Anastomosis in Minimally-invasive Left Colectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Vaghiri S, Prassas D, Krieg S, Knoefel W, Krieg A J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(12):3024-3037.

PMID: 37698813 PMC: 10837220. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05827-1.


Pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection: retrospective multicentre study.

Zhong H, Cai Z, Lu J, Yang Y, Xu Q, Wang N BJS Open. 2023; 7(3).

PMID: 37161672 PMC: 10170256. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad045.


Intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Wang C, Ye R, Lin X, Tan S Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1145579.

PMID: 37124506 PMC: 10130395. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1145579.


References
1.
Bernstein M, Dawson J, Reissman P, Weiss E, Nogueras J, Wexner S . Is complete laparoscopic colectomy superior to laparoscopic assisted colectomy?. Am Surg. 1996; 62(6):507-11. View

2.
Noel J, Fahrbach K, Estok R, Cella C, Frame D, Linz H . Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204(2):291-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.10.002. View

3.
Lacy A, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique J . Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9325):2224-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5. View

4.
Bergamaschi R, Tuetch J, Pessaux P, Arnaud J . Intracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14(6):520-3. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000094. View

5.
Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E . Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 10(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. View