» Articles » PMID: 20108122

Predictors of Survival in Periampullary Cancers Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jan 29
PMID 20108122
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cancers of the ampulla of Vater, distal common bile duct, and pancreas are known to have dismal prognosis. It is often reported that ampullary cancers are less aggressive relative to the other periampullary carcinomas. We sought to evaluate predictors of survival for periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy to identify biologic behavior.

Methods: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma between 1992 and 2007 at the Ohio State University Medical Center. Demographics, treatment, and outcome/survival data were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created and compared by log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis was undertaken using Cox proportional-hazards method.

Results: 346 consecutive periampullary malignancies (249 pancreatic cancers, 79 ampullary carcinomas, 18 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas) treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified. Pancreatic cancer histology correlated with the shortest median survival (17.1 months), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (17.9 months) and ampullary carcinoma (44.3 months) (P < 0.001). Potential predictors of decreased survival on univariate analysis included site of origin, preoperative jaundice, microscopic positive margin, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, and poor differentiation. Only nodal metastasis (median 16.2 versus 29.9 months, P < 0.001) and neural invasion (median 17.7 versus 47.9 months, P < 0.00001) significantly predicted outcome on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Although ampullary cancers have the best prognosis overall, when controlled for tumor stage, only presence of neural invasion and nodal metastasis predict poor survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Biological behavior remains the most important prognostic indicator in periampullary cancers amenable to resection, regardless of site of origin.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Ampullary and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Smaller Invasion, Common Adenomatous Components, Resectability, and Histology are Factors for Improved Survival for Patients with Ampullary Adenocarcinoma.

Memis B, Saka B, Pehlivanoglu B, Kim G, Balci S, Tajiri T Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):1858-1868.

PMID: 39402320 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16355-w.


The clinical significance of the lymph node ratio as a recurrence indicator in ampullary cancer after curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Hasegawa S, Wada H, Kubo M, Mukai Y, Mikamori M, Akita H Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):302.

PMID: 39377937 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03481-y.


Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Long-term outcome from a tertiary care centre.

Kanchodu S, Rao H, Mangyal S, Ganesh M J Minim Access Surg. 2024; 20(3):311-317.

PMID: 39047679 PMC: 11354953. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_264_23.


Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Reis P, Bittar V, Almiron G, Schramm A, Oliveira J, Cagnacci R J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024; 55(3):1058-1068.

PMID: 39028397 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01091-x.


Prognostic significance of necrosis in ampullary carcinomas.

Akar K, Bagci P Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(5):2179-2185.

PMID: 38922490 PMC: 11450078. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03740-3.


References
1.
Cameron J, Crist D, Sitzmann J, Hruban R, Boitnott J, Seidler A . Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 1991; 161(1):120-4; discussion 124-5. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90371-j. View

2.
Butturini G, Stocken D, Wente M, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl J, Bakkevold K . Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008; 143(1):75-83. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.17. View

3.
Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Takeda T, Miyazaki I . Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the distal bile duct based on a clinicopathologic study. Cancer. 1993; 72(7):2112-7. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931001)72:7<2112::aid-cncr2820720709>3.0.co;2-x. View

4.
Verbeke C, Menon K . Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2009; 11(4):282-9. PMC: 2727080. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00055.x. View

5.
Androulakis J, Colborn G, Skandalakis P, Skandalakis L, SKANDALAKIS J . Embryologic and anatomic basis of duodenal surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 80(1):171-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70401-1. View