» Articles » PMID: 20104419

Pain and Pain-related Interference in Adults with Lower-limb Amputation: Comparison of Knee-disarticulation, Transtibial, and Transfemoral Surgical Sites

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 28
PMID 20104419
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pain and pain-related interference with physical function have not been thoroughly studied in individuals who have undergone knee-disarticulation amputations. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether individuals with knee-disarticulation amputations have worse pain and pain-related interference with physical function than do individuals with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data provided by 42 adults with lower-limb amputations. These individuals consisted of 14 adults reporting knee-disarticulation amputation in one limb and best-matched cases (14 reporting transfemoral amputation and 14 reporting transtibial amputation) from a larger cross-sectional sample of 472 individuals. Participants were rigorously matched based on time since amputation, reason for amputation, age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, and pain before amputation. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Categorical outcomes were analyzed by Pearson chi-square statistic. Given the relatively small sample size and power concerns, mean differences were also described by estimated effect size (Cohen's d). Of the 42 participants, 83% were male. They ranged in age from 36 to 85 (median = 55.1, standard deviation = 11.0). Most amputations were of traumatic origin (74%), and participants were on average 12.4 years from their amputations at the time of the survey. Individuals with transtibial amputation reported significantly more prosthesis use than did individuals with knee-disarticulation amputation. Amputation levels did not significantly differ in phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, back pain, and pain-related interference with physical function. Estimates of effect size, however, indicated that participants with knee-disarticulation amputation reported less phantom limb pain, phantom limb pain-related interference with physical function, residual limb pain, residual limb pain-related interference with physical function, and back pain-related interference with physical function than did participants with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. This study demonstrated that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation used prostheses significantly less than did patients with transtibial amputation. However, no evidence was found that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation have worse outcomes in terms of pain and pain-related interference with physical function; in fact, they may have more favorable long-term outcomes.

Citing Articles

Postamputation Residual Limb Pain Severity and Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Evans A, Chaker S, Curran G, Downer M, Assi P, Joseph J Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022; 30(3):254-268.

PMID: 35990396 PMC: 9389065. DOI: 10.1177/22925503211019646.


Kinetic Gait Parameters in Unilateral Lower Limb Amputations and Normal Gait in Able-Bodied: Reference Values for Clinical Application.

Schmid-Zalaudek K, Fischer T, Szava Z, Lackner H, Kropiunig U, Bittner C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 35628810 PMC: 9145518. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102683.


EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.

Cimolato A, Driessen J, Mattos L, Momi E, Laffranchi M, De Michieli L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1):43.

PMID: 35526003 PMC: 9077893. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01019-1.


Factors affecting activities of daily living, physical balance, and prosthesis adjustment in non-traumatic lower limb amputees.

Karaali E, Duramaz A, Ciloglu O, Yalin M, Atay M, Aslantas F Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 66(4):405-412.

PMID: 33364560 PMC: 7756832. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.4623.


Osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of transtibial amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia surgical technique and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Haque R, Al-Jawazneh S, Hoellwarth J, Akhtar M, Doshi K, Tan Y BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10):e038346.

PMID: 33082192 PMC: 7577069. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038346.


References
1.
Ehde D, Czerniecki J, Smith D, Campbell K, Edwards W, Jensen M . Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(8):1039-44. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2000.7583. View

2.
Pinzur M . Gait analysis in peripheral vascular insufficiency through-knee amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993; 30(4):388-92. View

3.
Sherman R . Stump and phantom limb pain. Neurol Clin. 1989; 7(2):249-64. View

4.
Pinzur M, Bowker J . Knee disarticulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (361):23-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199904000-00004. View

5.
Waters R, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H . Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(1):42-6. View