» Articles » PMID: 20095915

Safety and Efficacy of Single-day GemOx Regimen in Patients with Pancreatobiliary Cancer: a Single Institution Experience

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2010 Jan 26
PMID 20095915
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: GemOx (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 100 min on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 2 weeks) achieved a response rate of 26.8%, improved progression-free survival (PFS) but failed to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. This regimen has regained attention after recent pooled- and meta-analysis suggested a survival benefit of gemcitabine-platinum doublets over gemcitabine. However, GemOx is associated with inconvenience to patients, early cumulative dose developing neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. In addition, fixed dose rate of gemcitabine showed no benefit > 30 min infusion schedule in the ECOG6201 study. Pharmacokinetic profiles of both drugs did not show statistically significant difference regardless of the order of administration.

Patients And Methods: In order to create a more convenient and equally effective regimen, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-day modified GemOx (S-GemOx, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 30 min and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) > 2 h on day 1 every 2 weeks) in patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Results: In all, 34 patients (median age 60 years, male/female: 17/17) received S-GemOx including locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (26) and biliary duct carcinoma (8). Median treatment was six cycles with duration of 12 weeks (range (r): 2 - 56). Median cumulative dose of oxaliplatin was 517.5 mg/m(2) (r: 85 - 2380). A total of 27 of 34 patients were evaluated for efficacy after initial staging: 1 (3.7%) complete response (CR), 4 (14.8%) partial response (PR), 18 (66.7%) stable disease and 4 (14.8%) progression of disease. Overall response rate (CR + PR) was 18.5%. Median PFS and OS were 7 and 11.6 months, respectively. All patients were assessed for toxicities. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities include anemia (8%), neutropenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (5%), nausea/vomiting (3%), diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity reaction (14%) and neuropathy (3%). No deaths occurred due to therapy.

Conclusions: S-GemOx regimen provides convenient schedule, toxicities appear to be comparable with GemOx. The incidence of neuropathy (3 vs 19.1%) and thrombocytopenia (5 vs 14%) are substantially lower compared with GemOx. Prospective studies of S-GemOx in a large patient population are warranted.

Citing Articles

The travails of therapeutic modifications in cancer care amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Future directions and lessons learned.

Almas T, Goraya M, Tarar Z, Khedro T, Ehtesham M, Malik U Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 66:102411.

PMID: 34094529 PMC: 8163725. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102411.


Use of zebrafish embryos as avatar of patients with pancreatic cancer: A new xenotransplantation model towards personalized medicine.

Di Franco G, Usai A, Funel N, Palmeri M, Montesanti I, Bianchini M World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(21):2792-2809.

PMID: 32550755 PMC: 7284182. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2792.


Systemic Treatment of Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Outbreak: COVID-19-adapted Recommendations of the National Cancer Institute of Milan.

Pietrantonio F, Morano F, Niger M, Corallo S, Antista M, Raimondi A Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020; 19(3):156-164.

PMID: 32513593 PMC: 7245227. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.05.004.


Simplified/Same Day(s)-GOLF as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP), Suggestive of Pancreatobiliary Tumors.

Saif M, Wasif K, Goodman M, Hegde S, Sterling M, Yacavone R JOP. 2020; 20(5):121-124.

PMID: 32104166 PMC: 7043200.


A Retrospective Case Series Of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) In Combination With Gemcitabine And Oxaliplatin (Gemox) On Treating Elderly Middle And Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Tao S, Gu W, Gu J, Zhu M, Wang Q, Zheng L Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12:9735-9745.

PMID: 31814733 PMC: 6863124. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S220299.