» Articles » PMID: 20090283

Literacy Assessment of Family Health History Tools for Public Health Prevention

Overview
Specialties Genetics
Public Health
Date 2010 Jan 22
PMID 20090283
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the readability and document complexity of currently available family history tools for the general public.

Methods: Three steps were undertaken to identify family history tools for evaluation: (a) Internet searches, (b) expert consultation, and (c) literature searches. Tools identified were assessed for readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula. The complexity of documents (i.e., forms collecting family history information) was assessed using the PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula.

Results: A total of 78 tools were identified, 47 of which met the criteria for inclusion. SMOG reading grade levels for multimedia-based tools ranged from 10.1 to 18.3, with an average score of 13.6. For print-based tools, SMOG ranged from 8.7 to 14.1, with an average score of 12.0. Document complexity ranged from very low complexity (level 1 proficiency) to high complexity (level 4 proficiency).

Conclusion: The majority of tools are written at a reading grade level that is beyond the 8th grade average reading level in the United States. The lack of family history tools that are easy to read or use may compromise their potential effectiveness in identifying individuals at increased risk for chronic diseases in the general population.

Citing Articles

Study protocol: Exploring the use of Family Health Histories in the African American community to reduce health disparities in Flint, Michigan.

Key K, Lewis L, Blanchard C, Sikorskii A, Patel M, Lucas T Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38645135 PMC: 11030532. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4131949/v1.


Unawareness of breast cancer family history among African women.

Adedokun B, Ademola A, Makumbi T, Odedina S, Agwai I, Ndom P Pan Afr Med J. 2023; 45:188.

PMID: 38020349 PMC: 10656588. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.188.21616.


Understanding the Process of Family Cancer History Collection and Health Information Seeking.

Allen C, Green R, Dowling N, Fairley T, Khoury M Health Educ Behav. 2023; 50(5):572-585.

PMID: 36794801 PMC: 10427738. DOI: 10.1177/10901981231152430.


Barriers to family history collection among Spanish-speaking primary care patients: a BRIDGE qualitative study.

Liebermann E, Taber P, Vega A, Daly B, Goodman M, Bradshaw R PEC Innov. 2022; 1.

PMID: 36532299 PMC: 9757734. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100087.


A validation of models for prediction of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes.

Shyr C, Blackford A, Huang T, Ke J, Ouardaoui N, Trippa L Genet Med. 2022; 24(10):2155-2166.

PMID: 35997715 PMC: 10312204. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.004.


References
1.
Quillin J, Ramakrishnan V, Borzelleca J, Bodurtha J, Bowen D, Wilson D . Paternal relatives and family history of breast cancer. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31(3):265-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.05.002. View

2.
Westman J, Hampel H, Bradley T . Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment. J Med Genet. 2000; 37(5):354-60. PMC: 1734575. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.37.5.354. View

3.
Hurt G, McQuellon R, Michielutte R, Conrad D, Carter S, Anderson H . Risk assessment of first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer: a feasibility study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001; 28(7):1097-104. View

4.
Leggatt V, Mackay J, Yates J . Evaluation of questionnaire on cancer family history in identifying patients at increased genetic risk in general practice. BMJ. 1999; 319(7212):757-8. PMC: 28230. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.757. View

5.
Hughes K, Roche C, Campbell C, Siegel N, Salisbury L, Chekos A . Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire. Breast J. 2003; 9(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09105.x. View