» Articles » PMID: 20086119

Function of the Appendages in Tentacled Snakes (Erpeton Tentaculatus)

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 21
PMID 20086119
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the function of the tentacles in aquatic, piscivorous tentacled snakes (Erpeton tentaculatus) by examining anatomy, peripheral innervation, and the response properties of primary afferents. We also investigated visual and somatosensory responses in the optic tectum and documented predatory strikes to visual stimuli and under infrared illumination. Our results show the tentacles are sensitive mechanoreceptors that respond to water movements. They are innervated by rami of the maxillary and ophthalmic branches of the trigeminal nerve and contain a dense array of fine terminal neurites that cross the interior of the tentacle orthogonal to its long axis. The optic tectum contained a retinotopic map of contralateral receptive fields with superior fields represented dorsally in the tectum, inferior fields represented laterally, nasal fields represented rostrally, and temporal fields represented caudally. Large somatosensory receptive fields were identified in deeper layers of the tectum and were in approximate register with overlying visual fields. Tentacled snakes struck accurately at a simulated digital fish, indicating that visual cues are sufficient to guide strikes, but they also captured fish under infrared illumination, suggesting water movements alone could be used to localize prey. We conclude the tentacles are mechanosensors that are used to detect fish position based on water movements and that visual and mechanosensory cues may be integrated in the tectum to enhance localization when visual cues are reduced.

Citing Articles

Using mangrove and field observation data to identify fine-scale species distributions: a case study in bockadams (Serpentes: Homalopsidae: ).

Bernstein J, Bautista J, Clores M, Brown R, Ruane S, Sanguila M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):240483.

PMID: 39469132 PMC: 11515136. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240483.


Integrative methods reveal multiple drivers of diversification in rice paddy snakes.

Bernstein J, Voris H, Stuart B, Karns D, McGuire J, Iskandar D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4727.

PMID: 38472264 PMC: 10933303. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54744-z.


Foraging mode constrains the evolution of cephalic horns in lizards and snakes.

Banfi F, Meiri S, Shine R, Van Damme R, Baeckens S Biol Lett. 2023; 19(11):20230395.

PMID: 37990563 PMC: 10663784. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0395.


Using natricine snakes to test how prey type and size affect predatory behaviors and performance.

Gripshover N, Jayne B Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1134131.

PMID: 37214640 PMC: 10196387. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1134131.


Comparative Genomics Provides Insights into Adaptive Evolution in Tactile-Foraging Birds.

Wang L, Sun L, Wan Q, Fang S Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(4).

PMID: 35456484 PMC: 9028243. DOI: 10.3390/genes13040678.