» Articles » PMID: 20084412

Pedicle Screw-based Dynamic Stabilization of the Thoracolumbar Spine with the Cosmic-system: a Prospective Observation

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2010 Jan 20
PMID 20084412
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object: The objective of the study was to generate prospective data to assess the clinical results after dynamic stabilization with the Cosmic system (Ulrich Medical).

Patients And Methods: Between April 2006 and December 2007, 103 consecutive patients were treated with Cosmic for painful degenerative segmental instability +/- spinal stenosis. The preoperative workup included radiological (MRI and myelography/CT) and clinical parameters (general/neurological examination, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), SF-36, Karnofsky (KPS)). At pre-defined intervals (at discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly) the patients were reevaluated (X-ray/flexion/extension, neurological status, VAS, ODI, SF-36, KPS, and patient satisfaction). Data were collected in a prospective observational design.

Results: Data collection was completed in 100 of 103 operated patients (mean follow-up, 15 +/- 0.6 months). Dynamic stabilization was performed as first-tier surgery in 43 cases and as second-tier therapy in 60 cases. Additional decompression was performed in 83 cases. Dynamic stabilization led to significant reduction of back pain-related disability (ODI pre-op, 51 +/- 1%; post-op, 21 +/- 1%) and improvement of pain (VAS pre-op, 65 +/- 1; post-op, 21 +/- 2), mental/physical health (norm-based SF-36: mental pre-op, 44; post-op, 48; physical pre-op, 41; post-op, 46), and mobility (KPS pre-op, 70 +/- 1; post-op, 82 +/- 31). Early reoperation was necessary in 12 patients (n = 3 symptomatic misplaced screws, n = 8 CSF pseudocele, rebleeding, or impaired wound healing, n = 1 misjudged instability/stenosis in adjacent segment). Reoperations within the follow-up period were necessary in another 10 patients due to secondary screw loosening (n = 2), persistent stenosis/disk protrusion in an instrumented segment (n = 3), symptomatic degeneration of an adjacent segment (n = 6), or osteoporotic fracture of an adjacent vertebra (n = 1), respectively. Patient satisfaction rate was 91%.

Conclusions: Dynamic stabilization with Cosmic achieved significant improvement of pain, related disability, mental/physical health, and mobility, respectively, and a high rate of satisfied patients. A reoperation rate of 10% during follow-up seems relatively high at first glance. Comparable data, however, are scarce, and a prospective randomized trial (spondylodesis vs. dynamic stabilization) is warranted based on these results.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical evaluation of modified and traditional cortical bone trajectory technique on adjacent segment degeneration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-finite element analysis.

Tuoheti A, Xiao Y, Wang Y, Maimaiti A, Zhang R, Kahaer A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):7.

PMID: 38166794 PMC: 10759649. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07103-4.


Comprehensive comparison of three techniques for the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion.

Li T, He H, Zhang T, Li X, Xie W, Huang B Front Surg. 2023; 10:1096483.

PMID: 37066013 PMC: 10097961. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1096483.


Lumbar Stabilization with DSS-HPS System: Radiological Outcomes and Correlation with Adjacent Segment Degeneration.

Angelini A, Baracco R, Procura A, Nena U, Ruggieri P Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679589 PMC: 8534523. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101891.


Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of thoracolumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis.

Yao X, Chen F, Dong C, Wang J, Tan Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(2):e18202.

PMID: 31914013 PMC: 6959885. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018202.


Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nayak N, Stephen J, Piazza M, Obayemi A, Stein S, Malhotra N Global Spine J. 2019; 9(1):67-76.

PMID: 30775211 PMC: 6362549. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217701104.