» Articles » PMID: 20084182

Kindergarten Predictors of Math Learning Disability

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2010 Jan 20
PMID 20084182
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to address how to effectively predict mathematics learning disability (MLD). Specifically, we addressed whether cognitive data obtained during kindergarten can effectively predict which children will have MLD in third grade, whether an abbreviated test battery could be as effective as a standard psychoeducational assessment at predicting MLD, and whether the abbreviated battery corresponded to the literature on MLD characteristics. Participants were 226 children who enrolled in a 4-year prospective longitudinal study during kindergarten. We administered measures of mathematics achievement, formal and informal mathematics ability, visual-spatial reasoning, and rapid automatized naming and examined which test scores and test items from kindergarten best predicted MLD at grades 2 and 3. Statistical models using standardized scores from the entire test battery correctly classified ~80-83 percent of the participants as having, or not having, MLD. Regression models using scores from only individual test items were less predictive than models containing the standard scores, except for models using a specific subset of test items that dealt with reading numerals, number constancy, magnitude judgments of one-digit numbers, or mental addition of one-digit numbers. These models were as accurate in predicting MLD as was the model including the entire set of standard scores from the battery of tests examined. Our findings indicate that it is possible to effectively predict which kindergartners are at risk for MLD, and thus the findings have implications for early screening of MLD.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Learning Disorder Treatment for Reading or Mathematics Disorders: An Open Study.

Lee H, Song I, Kim W, Huh H, Lee E, Jung J Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2024; 35(2):143-149.

PMID: 38601103 PMC: 11001502. DOI: 10.5765/jkacap.230071.


Visual perception and linguistic abilities, not quantitative knowledge, count in geometric knowledge of kindergarten children.

Liu K, Huang X, Yang X Cogn Process. 2023; 24(4):563-574.

PMID: 37428367 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-023-01145-1.


The development of place value concepts: Approximation before principles.

Mix K, Bower C, Hancock G, Yuan L, Smith L Child Dev. 2022; 93(3):778-793.

PMID: 35023576 PMC: 9177579. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13724.


Differential Patterns of Growth in Reading and Math Skills during Elementary School.

Little C, Lonigan C, Phillips B J Educ Psychol. 2021; 113(3):462-476.

PMID: 34017147 PMC: 8130866. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000635.


Towards a South African model of language-based learning disability.

Mazibuko X, Flack P, Kvalsvig J S Afr J Commun Disord. 2019; 66(1):e1-e8.

PMID: 31793312 PMC: 6890563. DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.634.


References
1.
Geary D, Hoard M, Hamson C . Numerical and arithmetical cognition: patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999; 74(3):213-39. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2515. View

2.
Mazzocco M, Myers G . Complexities in Identifying and Defining Mathematics Learning Disability in the Primary School-Age Years. Ann Dyslexia. 2009; 53(1):218-253. PMC: 2742419. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-003-0011-7. View

3.
Siegel L, Ryan E . The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Dev. 1989; 60(4):973-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb03528.x. View

4.
Landerl K, Bevan A, Butterworth B . Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition. 2004; 93(2):99-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004. View

5.
Alarcon M, DeFries J, Light J, Pennington B . A twin study of mathematics disability. J Learn Disabil. 1997; 30(6):617-23. DOI: 10.1177/002221949703000605. View