» Articles » PMID: 20084090

Sample Sizes Required to Detect Interactions Between Two Binary Fixed-Effects in a Mixed-Effects Linear Regression Model

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 20
PMID 20084090
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mixed-effects linear regression models have become more widely used for analysis of repeatedly measured outcomes in clinical trials over the past decade. There are formulae and tables for estimating sample sizes required to detect the main effects of treatment and the treatment by time interactions for those models. A formula is proposed to estimate the sample size required to detect an interaction between two binary variables in a factorial design with repeated measures of a continuous outcome. The formula is based, in part, on the fact that the variance of an interaction is fourfold that of the main effect. A simulation study examines the statistical power associated with the resulting sample sizes in a mixed-effects linear regression model with a random intercept. The simulation varies the magnitude (Δ) of the standardized main effects and interactions, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ρ ), and the number (k) of repeated measures within-subject. The results of the simulation study verify that the sample size required to detect a 2 × 2 interaction in a mixed-effects linear regression model is fourfold that to detect a main effect of the same magnitude.

Citing Articles

Awake Prone Positioning in Adults With COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

Luo J, Pavlov I, Tavernier E, Perez Y, Kharat A, McNicholas B JAMA Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40063016 PMC: 11894540. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0011.


How do socioeconomic inequalities and preterm birth interact to modify health and education outcomes? A narrative systematic review.

McHale P, Fahy K, Pennington A, Schluter D, Barr B, Taylor-Robinson D BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e084147.

PMID: 39863409 PMC: 11784320. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084147.


Validity of Linear and Nonlinear Measures of Gait Variability to Characterize Aging Gait with a Single Lower Back Accelerometer.

Piergiovanni S, Terrier P Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39685964 PMC: 11644259. DOI: 10.3390/s24237427.


How Gender Shapes Sibling Tension in Adulthood Following Parental Death.

Suitor J, Gilligan M, Ogle D, Frase R, Hou Y, Stepniak C J Marriage Fam. 2024; 86(3):677-697.

PMID: 39478789 PMC: 11521372. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12951.


Internet-based cognitive behavioral intervention for adolescents with anxiety disorders: a study protocol for a parallel three armed randomized controlled trial.

Skaarnes H, Sorensen N, Wisnewski A, Lomholt J, Thastum M, McLellan L Trials. 2024; 25(1):674.

PMID: 39396991 PMC: 11472426. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08511-0.


References
1.
Rush A, Trivedi M, Ibrahim H, Carmody T, Arnow B, Klein D . The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54(5):573-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8. View

2.
Overall J, Doyle S . Estimating sample sizes for repeated measurement designs. Control Clin Trials. 1994; 15(2):100-23. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90015-9. View

3.
Kraemer H, Wilson G, Fairburn C, Agras W . Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002; 59(10):877-83. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877. View

4.
Hsieh F . Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization. Stat Med. 1988; 7(11):1195-201. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780071113. View

5.
Laird N, Ware J . Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982; 38(4):963-74. View