» Articles » PMID: 20078486

Retraining Automatic Action-tendencies to Approach Alcohol in Hazardous Drinkers

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Jan 19
PMID 20078486
Citations 149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The main aim of this study was to test whether automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol can be modified, and whether this affects drinking behaviour.

Design And Participants: Forty-two hazardous drinkers were assigned randomly to a condition in which they were implicitly trained to avoid or to approach alcohol, using a training variety of the alcohol Approach Avoidance Test (AAT). Participants pushed or pulled a joystick in response to picture-format (landscape or portrait). The pictures depicted alcoholic or non-alcoholic drinks. Participants in the avoid-alcohol condition pushed most alcoholic and pulled most non-alcoholic drinks. For participants in the approach-alcohol condition these contingencies were reversed. After the implicit training, participants performed a taste test, including beers and soft drinks. Automatic action tendencies at post-test were assessed with the AAT, including both trained and untrained pictures, and with a different test (Implicit Association Test, IAT). We further tested effects on subjective craving.

Results: Action tendencies for alcohol changed in accordance with training condition, with the largest effects in the clinically relevant avoid-alcohol condition. These effects occurred outside subjective awareness and generalized to new pictures in the AAT and to an entirely different test using words, rather than pictures (IAT). In relatively heavy drinking participants who demonstrated changed action tendencies in accordance with their training condition, effects were found on drinking behaviour, with participants in the approach-alcohol condition drinking more alcohol than participants in the avoid-alcohol condition. No effect was found on subjective craving.

Conclusions: Retraining automatic processes may help to regain control over addictive impulses, which points to new treatment possibilities.

Citing Articles

Approach Bias Modification for reducing Co-Occurring Alcohol and cannabis use among treatment-seeking Adolescents: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Hahn A, Corcoran E, Danielson C Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025; 44:101435.

PMID: 39944963 PMC: 11814518. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101435.


The Neural Correlates of Alcohol Approach Bias - New Insights from a Whole-Brain Network Analysis Perspective.

Muller A, Manning V, Wong C, Pennington D medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39399042 PMC: 11469381. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.26.24314399.


Assessing motivational biases in brain and behavior: Event-related potential and response time concomitants of the approach-avoidance task.

Sege C, Lopez J, Hellman N, McTeague L Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14700.

PMID: 39392380 PMC: 11578779. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14700.


Attentional bias to alcohol-related cues: effects of menstrual cycle phase and sex differences.

Griffith A, Martel M, Fillmore M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 242(1):117-127.

PMID: 39177809 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06652-3.


Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Stimulus Evaluation.

Chen Z, Van Dessel P Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:898-923.

PMID: 39077108 PMC: 11285421. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00151.