» Articles » PMID: 20067548

Investigation of Esophageal Sensation and Biomechanical Properties in Functional Chest Pain

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 14
PMID 20067548
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is limited and conflicting data regarding the role of esophageal hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of functional chest pain (FCP). We examined esophageal sensori-motor properties, mechanics, and symptoms in subjects with FCP.

Methods: Esophageal balloon distension test was performed using impedance planimetry in 189 (m/f = 57/132) consecutive subjects with non-cardiac, non-reflux chest pain, and 36 (m/f = 16/20) healthy controls. The biomechanical and sensory properties of subjects with and without esophageal hypersensitivity were compared with controls. The frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain were assessed.

Key Results: One hundred and forty-three (75%) subjects had esophageal hypersensitivity and 46 (25%) had normal sensitivity. Typical chest pain was reproduced in 105/143 (74%) subjects. Subjects with hypersensitivity demonstrated larger cross-sectional area (P < 0.001), decreased esophageal wall strain (P < 0.001) and distensibility (P < 0.001), and lower thresholds for perception (P < 0.01), discomfort (P < 0.01), and pain (P < 0.01) compared to those without hypersensitivity or healthy controls. Chest pain scores (mean +/- SD) for frequency, intensity and duration were 2.5 +/- 0.3, 2.2 +/- 0.2, and 2.2 +/- 0.2, respectively, and were similar between the two patient groups.

Conclusions & Inferences: Seventy-five per cent of subjects with FCP demonstrate esophageal hypersensitivity. Visceral hyperalgesia and sensori-motor dysfunction of the esophagus play a key role in the pathogenesis of chest pain.

Citing Articles

Characterization of the layer, direction and time-dependent mechanical behaviour of the human oesophagus and the effects of formalin preservation.

Durcan C, Hossain M, Chagnon G, Peric D, Girard E J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(213):20230592.

PMID: 38593841 PMC: 11003784. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0592.


Mechanical experimentation of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review.

Durcan C, Hossain M, Chagnon G, Peric D, Girard E Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023; 23(1):23-59.

PMID: 37935880 PMC: 10901955. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01773-8.


Capsaicin-Sensitive Vagal Afferent Nerve-Mediated Interoceptive Signals in the Esophagus.

Yu M, Chang C, Undem B, Yu S Molecules. 2021; 26(13).

PMID: 34203134 PMC: 8271978. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133929.


Diagnosis and Management of Functional Chest Pain in the Rome IV Era.

Fass R, Shibli F, Tawil J J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 25(4):487-498.

PMID: 31587539 PMC: 6786446. DOI: 10.5056/jnm19146.


The role of oesophageal physiological testing in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain.

Heinrich H, Sweis R Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2019; 9(12):257-267.

PMID: 30719270 PMC: 6348533. DOI: 10.1177/2040622318791392.


References
1.
Park M, Camilleri M . Genetics and genotypes in irritable bowel syndrome: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005; 34(2):305-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2005.02.009. View

2.
Mayer E, Gebhart G . Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107(1):271-93. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90086-8. View

3.
Sarkar S, Aziz Q, Woolf C, Hobson A, Thompson D . Contribution of central sensitisation to the development of non-cardiac chest pain. Lancet. 2000; 356(9236):1154-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02758-6. View

4.
Cervero F, Janig W . Visceral nociceptors: a new world order?. Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15(10):374-8. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90182-8. View

5.
Rao S, Mudipalli R, Remes-Troche J, Utech C, Zimmerman B . Theophylline improves esophageal chest pain--a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(5):930-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01112.x. View