» Articles » PMID: 20067338

Integrating Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes: DNA Transposases in Light of Structure

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2010 Jan 14
PMID 20067338
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA rearrangements are important in genome function and evolution. Genetic material can be rearranged inadvertently during processes such as DNA repair, or can be moved in a controlled manner by enzymes specifically dedicated to the task. DNA transposases comprise one class of such enzymes. These move DNA segments known as transposons to new locations, without the need for sequence homology between transposon and target site. Several biochemically distinct pathways have evolved for DNA transposition, and genetic and biochemical studies have provided valuable insights into many of these. However, structural information on transposases - particularly with DNA substrates - has proven elusive in most cases. On the other hand, large-scale genome sequencing projects have led to an explosion in the number of annotated prokaryotic and eukaryotic mobile elements. Here, we briefly review biochemical and mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition, and propose that integrating sequence information with structural information using bioinformatics tools such as secondary structure prediction and protein threading can lead not only to an additional level of understanding but possibly also to testable hypotheses regarding transposition mechanisms. Detailed understanding of transposition pathways is a prerequisite for the long-term goal of exploiting DNA transposons as genetic tools and as a basis for genetic medical applications.

Citing Articles

How RAG1/2 evolved from ancestral transposases to initiate V(D)J recombination without transposition.

Chen X, Yao L, Ma S, Yuan X, Yang Y, Yuan Y Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39989977 PMC: 11844651. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5443361/v1.


Mobilome impacts on physiology in the widely used non-toxic mutant Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 ΔmcyB and toxic wildtype.

Stark G, Truchon A, Wilhelm S BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):922.

PMID: 39363260 PMC: 11448079. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10839-5.


Bioinformatic analysis of THAP9 transposase homolog: conserved regions, novel motifs.

Rashmi R, Nandi C, Majumdar S Curr Res Struct Biol. 2024; 7:100113.

PMID: 38292821 PMC: 10824691. DOI: 10.1016/j.crstbi.2023.100113.


Expression of OsHARBI1-1 enhances the tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana to cadmium.

Jiang N, Shi Y, Li M, Du Z, Chen J, Jiang W BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23(1):556.

PMID: 37950159 PMC: 10638780. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04540-0.


New faces of prokaryotic mobile genetic elements: guide RNAs link transposition with host defense mechanisms.

Koonin E, Krupovic M Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2023; 36.

PMID: 37779558 PMC: 10538440. DOI: 10.1016/j.coisb.2023.100473.


References
1.
Dyda F, Hickman A, Jenkins T, Engelman A, Craigie R, Davies D . Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase: similarity to other polynucleotidyl transferases. Science. 1994; 266(5193):1981-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.7801124. View

2.
Hua-Van A, Capy P . Analysis of the DDE motif in the Mutator superfamily. J Mol Evol. 2008; 67(6):670-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-008-9178-1. View

3.
Woltjen K, Michael I, Mohseni P, Desai R, Mileikovsky M, Hamalainen R . piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2009; 458(7239):766-70. PMC: 3758996. DOI: 10.1038/nature07863. View

4.
Kim D, Dai Y, Mundy C, Yang W, Oettinger M . Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase. Genes Dev. 1999; 13(23):3070-80. PMC: 317176. DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.23.3070. View

5.
Ton-Hoang B, Turlan C, Chandler M . Functional domains of the IS1 transposase: analysis in vivo and in vitro. Mol Microbiol. 2004; 53(5):1529-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04223.x. View