» Articles » PMID: 20053644

Learning Your Own Strength: Winner and Loser Effects Should Change with Age and Experience

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 8
PMID 20053644
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Winner and loser effects, in which the outcome of an aggressive encounter influences the tendency to escalate future conflicts, have been documented in many taxa, but we have limited understanding of why they have evolved. One possibility is that individuals use previous victories and defeats to assess their fighting ability relative to others. We explored this idea by modelling a population of strong and weak individuals that do not know their own strength, but keep track of how many fights they have won. Under these conditions, adaptive behaviour generates clear winner and loser effects: individuals who win fights should escalate subsequent conflicts, whereas those who lose should retreat from aggressive opponents. But these effects depend strongly on age and experience. Young, naive individuals should show highly aggressive behaviour and pronounced loser effects. For these inexperienced individuals, fighting is especially profitable because it yields valuable information about their strength. Aggression should then decline as an individual ages and gains experience, with those who lose fights becoming more submissive. Older individuals, who have a better idea of their own strength, should be more strongly influenced by victories than losses. In conclusion, we predict that both aggressiveness and the relative magnitude of winner and loser effects should change with age, owing to changes in how individuals perceive their own strength.

Citing Articles

Responses of a resident group to an outsider in the blue-breasted quail: A paradigm for studying social resettlement of dispersers.

Zi S, Gao L, Chen X, Wang Q, Liu F, Li J Curr Zool. 2023; 69(3):236-243.

PMID: 37351300 PMC: 10284111. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac041.


Age-dependent winner-loser effects in a mangrove rivulus fish, Kryptolebias marmoratus.

Li C, Pan C, Hsu Y Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(5):1477-1488.

PMID: 37294474 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01797-8.


Social behavior in farm animals: Applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare.

Lee V, Arnott G, Turner S Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:932217.

PMID: 36032304 PMC: 9411962. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.932217.


Fighting force and experience combine to determine contest success in a warlike mammal.

Green P, Thompson F, Cant M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(25):e2119176119.

PMID: 35700363 PMC: 9231503. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2119176119.


Once bitten, twice shy: Aggressive and defeated pigs begin agonistic encounters with more negative emotions.

Oldham L, Arnott G, Camerlink I, Doeschl-Wilson A, Farish M, Wemelsfelder F Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2021; 244:105488.

PMID: 34819712 PMC: 8593554. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105488.


References
1.
Wingfield J . Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Horm Behav. 1994; 28(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.1994.1001. View

2.
Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof M . What sets the odds of winning and losing?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.014. View

3.
Stevens H, Leckman J, Coplan J, Suomi S . Risk and resilience: early manipulation of macaque social experience and persistent behavioral and neurophysiological outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 48(2):114-27. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318193064c. View

4.
Hsu , Wolf . The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(4):903-910. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049. View

5.
Oyegbile T, Marler C . Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm Behav. 2005; 48(3):259-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.007. View