» Articles » PMID: 20051332

A Combined SEMG and Accelerometer System for Monitoring Functional Activity in Stroke

Overview
Publisher IEEE
Date 2010 Jan 7
PMID 20051332
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remote monitoring of physical activity using body-worn sensors provides an alternative to assessment of functional independence by subjective, paper-based questionnaires. This study investigated the classification accuracy of a combined surface electromyographic (sEMG) and accelerometer (ACC) sensor system for monitoring activities of daily living in patients with stroke. sEMG and ACC data (eight channels each) were recorded from 10 hemiparetic patients while they carried out a sequence of 11 activities of daily living (identification tasks), and 10 activities used to evaluate misclassification errors (nonidentification tasks). The sEMG and ACC sensor data were analyzed using a multilayered neural network and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to identify the minimal sensor configuration needed to accurately classify the identification tasks, with a minimal number of misclassifications from the nonidentification tasks. The results demonstrated that the highest sensitivity and specificity for the identification tasks was achieved using a subset of four ACC sensors and adjacent sEMG sensors located on both upper arms, one forearm, and one thigh, respectively. This configuration resulted in a mean sensitivity of 95.0%, and a mean specificity of 99.7% for the identification tasks, and a mean misclassification error of < 10% for the nonidentification tasks. The findings support the feasibility of a hybrid sEMG and ACC wearable sensor system for automatic recognition of motor tasks used to assess functional independence in patients with stroke.

Citing Articles

Stretchable, Flexible, Breathable, Self-Adhesive Epidermal Hand sEMG Sensor System.

Yang K, Zhang S, Hu X, Li J, Zhang Y, Tong Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391632 PMC: 10886124. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020146.


Adaptations in equine appendicular muscle activity and movement occur during induced fore- and hindlimb lameness: An electromyographic and kinematic evaluation.

St George L, Spoormakers T, Smit I, Hobbs S, Clayton H, Roy S Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:989522.

PMID: 36425119 PMC: 9679508. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.989522.


Classifying and tracking rehabilitation interventions through machine-learning algorithms in individuals with stroke.

Espinoza Bernal V, Hiremath S, Wolf B, Riley B, Mendonca R, Johnson M J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021; 8:20556683211044640.

PMID: 34646574 PMC: 8504690. DOI: 10.1177/20556683211044640.


Variations in Patterns of Muscle Activity Observed in Participants Walking in Everyday Environments: Effect of Different Surfaces.

Lebleu J, Parry R, Bertouille C, de Schaetzen M, Mahaudens P, Wallard L Physiother Can. 2021; 73(3):268-275.

PMID: 34456444 PMC: 8370696. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0097.


Muscle Synergy of Lower Limb Motion in Subjects with and without Knee Pathology.

Chen J, Sun Y, Sun S Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34441253 PMC: 8392845. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081318.


References
1.
Janikow C . Fuzzy decision trees: issues and methods. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008; 28(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1109/3477.658573. View

2.
Mao J, Jain A . Artificial neural networks for feature extraction and multivariate data projection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1995; 6(2):296-317. DOI: 10.1109/72.363467. View

3.
Boose A, Spieker S, Jentgens C, Dichgans J . Wrist tremor: investigation of agonist-antagonist interaction by means of long-term EMG recording and cross-spectral analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996; 101(4):355-63. DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95533-2. View

4.
. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults--United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50(7):120-5. View

5.
Mathie M, Coster A, Lovell N, Celler B . Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas. 2004; 25(2):R1-20. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/2/r01. View