» Articles » PMID: 20050736

Root and Bone Response to the Proximity of a Mini-implant Under Orthodontic Loading

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Jan 7
PMID 20050736
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the histological reaction of the root and bone as a mini-implant approaches the root.

Materials And Methods: Two kinds of mini-implants were inserted into the buccal alveolar bone of 4 beagles (2 males and 2 females). The specimens were classified as the near-root group, the PDL contact group, the root contact group, and the root perforation group. Cementum resorption, dentin resorption, cementum repair, cementum growth, ankylosis, root cracking, and root fracture were assessed as the implant neared the root.

Results: The incidence of root resorption increased when the mini-implant was less than 0.6 mm from the root in the near-root group and PDL contact group. Root cracking and root fracture occurred in the root contact group and root perforation group. Bone resorption and ankylosis were observed in some specimens. However, some specimens of the PDL contact group and root contact group had cementum growth or little root resorption despite proximity to the root. In the root perforation group, root resorption and ankylosis occurred on the side opposite the insertion.

Conclusions: There is a risk of root contact and severe tissue damage from a thick mini-implant and the drilling procedure, either of which can induce root resorption or ankylosis. Use of smaller mini-implants may reduce root contact and tissue damage. However, the small mini-implant may need enhancement of its stability.

Citing Articles

Development and in vitro testing of an orthodontic miniscrew for use in the mandible.

Bauer C, Karl P, Mielke J, Roser C, Lux C, Scheurer M J Orofac Orthop. 2024; .

PMID: 39589499 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-024-00560-z.


Distalization of mandibular molar with iatrogenic root fracture in Class III malocclusion: a case report.

Kim H, Hong H, Jeon J, Lee K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1386.

PMID: 39548420 PMC: 11566079. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05174-w.


Automatic Segmentation of the Jaws Used in Guided Insertion of Orthodontic Mini Implants to Improve Their Stability and Precision.

David A, Brad S, Rusu L, David O, Samoila C, Leretter M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459446 PMC: 11509293. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101660.


Effects of an augmented reality aided system on the placement precision of orthodontic miniscrews: A pilot study.

Hsu M, Lin C, Hsu J, Yu J, Huang H J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(1):100-108.

PMID: 38303815 PMC: 10829748. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.025.


Influence of the Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique and Mixed Reality Technology on the Accuracy of the Orthodontic Micro-Screws Placement. An In Vitro Study.

Riad Deglow E, Toledano Gil S, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Bufala Perez M, Rodriguez Torres P, Tzironi G J Pers Med. 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34683105 PMC: 8539767. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11100964.


References
1.
Kim S, Lee S, Cho I, Kim S, Kim T . Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(5):899-907. DOI: 10.2319/090608-466.1. View

2.
Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H . Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(2):166-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70345-8. View

3.
Tosun T, Keles A, Erverdi N . Method for the placement of palatal implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17(1):95-100. View

4.
Martin W, Heffernan M, Ruskin J . Template fabrication for a midpalatal orthodontic implant: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17(5):720-2. View

5.
Kang Y, Kim J, Lee Y, Chung K, Park Y . Stability of mini-screws invading the dental roots and their impact on the paradental tissues in beagles. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(2):248-55. DOI: 10.2319/122007-413.1. View