» Articles » PMID: 20047622

Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil-based Treatment Algorithm in Patients Stratified by Age, Race, or Sex

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 6
PMID 20047622
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Demographic factors are known to influence the prevalence of hypertension, and evidence suggests that they may also influence the response of patients with hypertension to blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapies. To determine the effect of demographic factors on the efficacy and safety of an olmesartan medoxomil (OM)-based treatment regimen, we performed a prespecified subgroup analysis of a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, titrate-to-goal study in patients with hypertension, stratifying patients into treatment groups according to age, sex, or race. After 12 weeks, OM-based therapy significantly reduced BP from baseline in blacks, non-blacks, men, women, and patients younger than 65 or 65 years and older compared with placebo, and enabled 51.9% to 79.5% of patients to achieve a BP goal of <140/90 mm Hg. The differences in BP-lowering efficacy of OM-based therapy between subgroups were not clinically significant, and treatment was generally well tolerated in all groups. This study demonstrates that an OM-based treatment algorithm is an effective and safe option for achieving recommended BP goal in patients with hypertension including blacks, non-blacks, men, women, and patients younger than 65 or 65 years and older.

Citing Articles

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.

Kodati D, Kotakonda H, Yellu N Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2016; 42(4):573-581.

PMID: 27535556 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-016-0371-0.


Olmesartan in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: a review of the primary evidence.

Volpe M, Tocci G Drugs Aging. 2013; 30(12):987-98.

PMID: 24170236 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0130-8.


Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5/25 mg in daily practice.

Bramlage P, Zemmrich C, Ketelhut R, Wolf W, Fronk E, Schmieder R Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013; 9:475-83.

PMID: 24039432 PMC: 3769201. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S49118.


Combined olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide therapy in randomized patients with hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study by age.

Lewin A, Izzo Jr J, Melino M, Lee J, Fernandez V, Heyrman R Drugs Aging. 2013; 30(7):549-60.

PMID: 23549909 PMC: 3687106. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-013-0072-1.


Integrated control of hypertension by olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide and rationale for combination.

Punzi H Integr Blood Press Control. 2012; 4:73-83.

PMID: 22253546 PMC: 3257873. DOI: 10.2147/IBPC.S12214.


References
1.
Chrysant S, Weber M, Wang A, Hinman D . Evaluation of antihypertensive therapy with the combination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide. Am J Hypertens. 2004; 17(3):252-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.11.003. View

2.
Zannad F, Fay R . Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 21(2):181-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00464.x. View

3.
Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers S, Dahlof B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S . Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998; 351(9118):1755-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04311-6. View

4.
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N . Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007; 117(4):e25-146. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. View

5.
Ong K, Cheung B, Man Y, Lau C, Lam K . Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999-2004. Hypertension. 2006; 49(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000252676.46043.18. View