» Articles » PMID: 2004714

Gene Diversity and Female Philopatry

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1991 Feb 1
PMID 2004714
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of female philopatry on the apportionment of gene diversity within a population is evaluated. Even with random mate selection, the apportionment of gene diversity within and among social lineages (groups of related females) is inherently different than in classically defined demic groups. Considerable excess heterozygosity occurs within lineages without substantial changes in total or population heterozygosity. The proportion of genetic variance among lineages within the population was dependent on the lineage size and the number of male breeders per lineage. The greatest genetic differentiation among lineages was evident when there was one polygynous male breeding within a lineage of philopatric females, a common breeding tactic in mammalian social systems. The fixation indices depicting the genetic structure of the population were found to attain constant values after the first few generations despite the continuous loss of gene diversity within the population by genetic drift. Additionally, the change of gene correlations within individuals relative to the change within the population attains a state of dynamic equilibrium, as do the changes of gene correlations within lineages relative to the total and within individuals relative to within lineages. Comparisons of coancestries and fixation indices for philopatric versus randomly dispersing females indicate that philopatry and polygyny have probably not evolved independently and that promotion of gene correlations among adults rather than offspring has been of primary importance.

Citing Articles

Genomic Data Characterize Reproductive Ecology Patterns in Michigan Invasive Red Swamp Crayfish ().

Adams N, Homola J, Sard N, Nathan L, Roth B, Robinson J Evol Appl. 2024; 17(9):e70007.

PMID: 39286761 PMC: 11403126. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70007.


Are There Barriers Separating the Pink River Dolphin Populations (, Iniidae, Cetacea) within the Mamoré-Iténez River Basins (Bolivia)? An Analysis of Its Genetic Structure by Means of Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Markers.

Ruiz-Garcia M, Escobar-Armel P, Martinez-Aguero M, Gaviria M, Alvarez D, Pinedo M Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202372 PMC: 11353456. DOI: 10.3390/genes15081012.


Wright's Hierarchical F-Statistics.

Uyenoyama M Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(5).

PMID: 38696269 PMC: 11118444. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae083.


Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Normal Maize Germplasm Collected in South Sudan Revealed by SSR Markers.

Mathiang E, Sa K, Park H, Kim Y, Lee J Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36297809 PMC: 9611378. DOI: 10.3390/plants11202787.


Spatial population genetic structure and colony dynamics in Damaraland mole-rats (Fukomys damarensis) from the southern Kalahari.

Mynhardt S, Harris-Barnes L, Bloomer P, Bennett N BMC Ecol Evol. 2021; 21(1):221.

PMID: 34879824 PMC: 8653584. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01950-2.


References
1.
Hamilton W . The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964; 7(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. View

2.
Nei M, Chesser R . Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet. 1983; 47(3):253-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x. View

3.
Nei M . F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann Hum Genet. 1977; 41(2):225-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1977.tb01918.x. View

4.
Rothman E, Sing C, Templeton A . A model for analysis of population structure. Genetics. 1974; 78(3):943-60. PMC: 1224567. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/78.3.943. View

5.
Selander R . Behavior and genetic variation in natural populations. Am Zool. 1970; 10(1):53-66. DOI: 10.1093/icb/10.1.53. View