» Articles » PMID: 20046551

Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels Does Not Influence Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 5
PMID 20046551
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of applying joint mobilization at symptomatic and asymptomatic cervical levels in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Forty-eight patients aged between 18 and 65 years and presenting nonspecific neck pain with a minimum duration of 3 months were recruited for the study. Included patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups: (i) control group: the most symptomatic vertebral level was mobilized; (ii) experimental group: a randomly selected vertebral level was chosen and mobilized. All patients received one treatment session. Pain intensity in resting position during the most painful active cervical movement as well as during vertebral palpation was quantified using an 11-point pain scale. Follow-up measures were taken immediately after intervention by a blinded assessor. The results showed no significant difference in pain intensity immediately after treatment between groups (symptomatic level treated vs. randomly chosen cervical vertebral level treated) during resting position, painful active movement, or vertebral palpation. Within-group comparisons showed significant pain relief after treatment during the most painful active movement as well as during vertebral palpation for both groups, but not during resting position. Significant change in immediate pain intensity during painful active movement and vertebral palpation was achieved after vertebral mobilization. however, both groups presented similar pain reductions suggesting that pain reduction due to joint mobilization is not specific to the vertebral level being mobilized.

Citing Articles

The majority of clinical trials assessing mobilization and manipulation for neck pain lack a pragmatic approach: a systematic review of 174 trials.

Cottone K, Schumacher M, Young J, Rhon D J Man Manip Ther. 2024; 32(5):478-494.

PMID: 38525785 PMC: 11421161. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2327127.


An international consensus on gaps in mechanisms of forced-based manipulation research: findings from a nominal group technique.

Keter D, Bent J, Bialosky J, Courtney C, Esteves J, Funabashi M J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(1):111-117.

PMID: 37840477 PMC: 10795550. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2262336.


Time to evolve: the applicability of pain phenotyping in manual therapy.

Damian K, Chad C, Kenneth L, David G J Man Manip Ther. 2022; 30(2):61-67.

PMID: 35344468 PMC: 8967203. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2052560.


Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Joshi S, Balthillaya G, Neelapala Y Chiropr Man Therap. 2020; 28(1):38.

PMID: 32762708 PMC: 7412667. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-00327-4.


Combined use of cervical headache snag and cervical snag half rotation techniques in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.

Mohamed A, Shendy W, Semary M, Mourad H, Battecha K, Soliman E J Phys Ther Sci. 2019; 31(4):376-381.

PMID: 31037013 PMC: 6451950. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.31.376.


References
1.
Hoving J, Koes B, de Vet H, van der Windt D, Assendelft W, van Mameren H . Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136(10):713-22. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00006. View

2.
Korthals-de Bos I, Hoving J, Van Tulder M, Molken M, Ader H, de Vet H . Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003; 326(7395):911. PMC: 153837. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7395.911. View

3.
Hurwitz E, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski G, Yu F, Adams A . A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(10):1634-41. PMC: 1447299. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.10.1634. View

4.
Hurwitz E, Aker P, Adams A, Meeker W, Shekelle P . Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(15):1746-59; discussion 1759-60. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00007. View

5.
McLean S, Naish R, Reed L, Urry S, Vicenzino B . A pilot study of the manual force levels required to produce manipulation induced hypoalgesia. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2002; 17(4):304-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00017-7. View