» Articles » PMID: 20019989

Is Sparing the Prostate Still Considered Radical Cystectomy? The Case Against Prostate-sparing Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

Overview
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Dec 19
PMID 20019989
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

[Treatment of bladder cancer. Value of radical prostate-sparing cystectomy].

Heidenreich A, Porres D, Pfister D Urologe A. 2012; 51(6):813-9.

PMID: 22278165 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2786-1.

References
1.
Steers W . Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic neobladder. World J Urol. 2000; 18(5):330-7. DOI: 10.1007/s003450000146. View

2.
Wunderlich H, Wolf M, Reichelt O, Frober R, Schubert J . Radical cystectomy with ultrasound-guided partial prostatectomy for bladder cancer: a complication-preventing concept. Urology. 2006; 68(3):554-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.047. View

3.
Pettus J, Al-Ahmadie H, Barocas D, Koppie T, Herr H, Donat S . Risk assessment of prostatic pathology in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 53(2):370-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.031. View

4.
Muto G, Bardari F, DUrso L, Giona C . Seminal sparing cystectomy and ileocapsuloplasty: long-term followup results. J Urol. 2004; 172(1):76-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132130.64727.b6. View

5.
Visser O, Nieuwenhuijzen J, Horenblas S . Local recurrence after cystectomy and survival of patients with bladder cancer: a population based study in greater amsterdam. J Urol. 2005; 174(1):97-102. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162055.58405.96. View