» Articles » PMID: 20015890

Daily Practice Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes in France: Data from 907 Patients in a One-week Cross-sectional Study by the Groupe Francophone Des Myelodysplasies

Abstract

Background: There is little published information on the everyday clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes in real world practice.

Design And Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all patients with myelodysplastic syndromes attending 74 French centers in a 1-week period for inpatient admission, day-hospital care or outpatient visits.

Results: Nine hundred and seven patients were included; 67.3% had lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (International Prognostic Scoring System: low or intermediate-1). Karyotype had been analyzed in 82.5% of the cases and was more often of intermediate or poor risk in patients under 65 years old compared with those who were older. Red blood cell transfusions accounted for as many as 31.4% of the admissions. Endogenous erythropoietin level was less than 500 IU/L in 88% of the patients tested. Erythroid stimulating agents had been or were being used in 36.8% of the lower risk patients, iron chelation in 31% of lower risk patients requiring red blood cell transfusions and lenalidomide in 41% of lower risk patients with del 5q. High-dose chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, low dose cytarabine and allogeneic stem cell transplantation had been or were being used in 14.8%, 31.1%, 8.8% and 5.1%, respectively, of higher-risk patients.

Conclusions: Karyotype is now assessed in most patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, and patients under 65 years old may have more aggressive disease. Apart from erythroid-stimulating agents and, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, hypomethylating agents, specific treatments are used in a minority of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and red blood cell transfusions still represent the major reason for hospital admission.

Citing Articles

[A monocentric study on the management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes in Morocco].

El Maaroufi H, Ababou M, Hammani A, Ahchouch S, Jennane S, Mahtat M Pan Afr Med J. 2021; 37:300.

PMID: 33654519 PMC: 7881929. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.300.20972.


Time-dependent changes in mortality and transformation risk in MDS.

Pfeilstocker M, Tuechler H, Sanz G, Schanz J, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F Blood. 2016; 128(7):902-10.

PMID: 27335276 PMC: 5161006. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-700054.


Differences in community and academic practice patterns for newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients.

Pease D, Ross J, Poynter J, Nguyen P, Hirsch B, Cioc A Cancer Epidemiol. 2015; 39(2):222-8.

PMID: 25701277 PMC: 4361261. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.006.


Interpreting outcome data in hematopoietic cell transplantation for leukemia: tackling common biases.

Ofran Y, Lazarus H, Rapoport A, Rowe J Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015; 50(3):324-33.

PMID: 25581409 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.270.


What's all the fuss about? facts and figures about bone marrow failure and conditions.

Mukherjee S, Sekeres M Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2012; 7(4):300-9.

PMID: 22936422 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-012-0134-1.

References
1.
Nisse C, Haguenoer J, Grandbastien B, Preudhomme C, Fontaine B, Brillet J . Occupational and environmental risk factors of the myelodysplastic syndromes in the North of France. Br J Haematol. 2001; 112(4):927-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02645.x. View

2.
Park S, Grabar S, Kelaidi C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Picard F, Bardet V . Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G-CSF: the GFM experience. Blood. 2007; 111(2):574-82. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096370. View

3.
Wattel E, Cambier N, Caulier M, Sautiere D, Bauters F, Fenaux P . Androgen therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia: a report on 20 cases. Br J Haematol. 1994; 87(1):205-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb04895.x. View

4.
Sekeres M, Schoonen W, Kantarjian H, List A, Fryzek J, Paquette R . Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100(21):1542-51. PMC: 2579314. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn349. View

5.
Nachtkamp K, Kundgen A, Strupp C, Giagounidis A, Kobbe G, Gattermann N . Impact on survival of different treatments for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Leuk Res. 2009; 33(8):1024-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2008.12.019. View