Iliac Crest Angle: a Novel Sonographic Parameter for the Prediction of Down Syndrome Risk During the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

Overview

Journal Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2009 Dec 17

PMID 20014361

Citations 2

Authors

W Lee

M Balasubramaniam

L Yeo

S S Hassan

F Gotsch

J P Kusanovic

L F Goncalves

R Romero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To validate a new sonographic technique for the display and measurement of fetal iliac crest angle (ICA), and to determine the relative contribution of standardized fetal pelvic measurements for estimating risk of Down syndrome during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Methods: Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal pelvis was performed during a second-trimester scan for genetic amniocentesis. A coronal view of the 'virtual pelvis' was obtained by applying a maximum intensity projection algorithm to visualize both iliac wings. Two different ICAs were measured from a coronal projection of the fetal pelvis (ICA-coronal 1 and ICA-coronal 2); the latter approach relied on using ischial tuberosities as reference landmarks. Next, a coronal projection of the fetal pelvis was rotated to demonstrate a rendered view of the axial fetal pelvis. Axial inner (ICA-inner), middle (ICA-middle) and outer (ICA-outer) ICAs were measured. The maximum anterior iliac distance measurement was defined as the widest separation between the most anterior points of the rendered iliac crests. The reproducibility of each ICA method was analyzed using Bland-Altman statistics. Simple and multiple logistic regression analysis determined the relative contribution of each parameter as a prenatal predictor of Down syndrome.

Results: Ninety-four normal fetuses and 19 fetuses with Down syndrome were examined. The ICA-middle and ICA-coronal 2 parameters were the most reproducible angle measurements. The mean +/- SD ICA-middle measurement for fetuses with Down syndrome was significantly greater than that for normal subjects (94.5 +/- 9.8 degrees vs. 83.1 +/- 6.5 degrees ; P < 0.001). The mean +/- SD ICA-coronal 2 angle measurement for fetuses with Down syndrome was slightly greater than that for normal subjects (57.9 +/- 5.5 degrees vs. 51.9 +/- 7.1 degrees ; P = 0.0014). A multiple logistic regression model including ICA-middle and ICA-coronal 2 provided a predictive ability of 88.1% based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. This combination had a sensitivity of 94.4% for a false-positive rate of 5% in the detection of Down syndrome.

Conclusions: Standardized iliac crest measurements of the fetal pelvis can be used to identify some fetuses at risk for trisomy 21 during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Cartilage formation in the pelvic skeleton during the embryonic and early-fetal period.

Okumura M, Ishikawa A, Aoyama T, Yamada S, Uwabe C, Imai H PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0173852.

PMID: 28384153 PMC: 5383024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173852.

Morphometric Study of Subpubic Angle in Human Fetuses.

Haque M, Faruqi N, Yunus S J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(1):AC01-4.

PMID: 26894049 PMC: 4740576. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17699.7051.

References

Nyberg D, Souter V, Young S, Luthhardt F, Luthy D . Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20(10):1053-63. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1053. View

Delaere O, Kok V, Nyssen-Behets C, Dhem A . Ossification of the human fetal ilium. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992; 143(4):330-4. DOI: 10.1159/000147271. View

Hadlock F, Deter R, Harrist R, Park S . Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 138(4):649-53. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.4.649. View

Lee W, Blanckaert K, Bronsteen R, Huang R, Romero R . Fetal iliac angle measurements by three-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 18(2):150-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00447.x. View

CAFFEY J, Ames R, SILVERMAN W, Ryder C, Hough G . Contradiction of the congenital dysplasia-predislocation hypothesis of congenital dislocation of the hip through a study of the normal variation in acetabular angles at successive periods in infancy. Pediatrics. 1956; 17(5):632-41. View

Hadlock F, Shah Y, Kanon D, Lindsey J . Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology. 1992; 182(2):501-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.182.2.1732970. View

Hadlock F, Deter R, Harrist R, Park S . Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1982; 1(3):97-104. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1982.1.3.97. View

Sonek J, Borenstein M, Downing C, McKenna D, Neiger R, Croom C . Frontomaxillary facial angles in screening for trisomy 21 at 14-23 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(2):160.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.059. View

Massez A, Rypens F, Metens T, Donner C, Avni F . The iliac angle: a sonographic marker of trisomy 21 during the midtrimester: dependency of fetal lying?. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(9):2075-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1896-6. View

10.

Wald N, Rodeck C, Hackshaw A, Walters J, Chitty L, Mackinson A . First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS). J Med Screen. 2004; 10(2):56-104. DOI: 10.1258/096914103321824133. View

11.

Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson J, Pergament E, Silver R, Filkins K . First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(15):1405-13. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273. View

12.

Shipp T, Bromley B, Lieberman E, Benacerraf B . The second-trimester fetal iliac angle as a sign of Down's syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 12(1):15-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12010015.x. View

13.

Hadlock F, Deter R, Harrist R, Park S . Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 139(2):367-70. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.139.2.367. View

14.

Freed K, Kliewer M, Hertzberg B, Delong D, Paulson E, Nelson R . Pelvic CT morphometry in Down syndrome: implications for prenatal US evaluation--preliminary results. Radiology. 2000; 214(1):205-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00dc32205. View

15.

DeVore G . Trisomy 21: 91% detection rate using second-trimester ultrasound markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 16(2):133-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00203.x. View

16.

Hobbins J, Lezotte D, Persutte W, DeVore G, Benacerraf B, Nyberg D . An 8-center study to evaluate the utility of mid-term genetic sonograms among high-risk pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(1):33-8. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.1.33. View

17.

Bland J, Altman D . Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22(1):85-93. DOI: 10.1002/uog.122. View

18.

Abuhamad A, Kolm P, Mari G, Slotnick R, Evans 3rd A . Ultrasonographic fetal iliac length measurement in the screening for Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171(4):1063-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90036-1. View

19.

Zook P, Winter 3rd T, Nyberg D . Iliac angle as a marker for Down syndrome in second-trimester fetuses: CT measurement. Radiology. 1999; 211(2):447-51. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma34447. View

20.

Shipp T, Bromley B, Lieberman E, Benacerraf B . The iliac angle as a sonographic marker for Down syndrome in second-trimester fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(3):446-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00508-5. View