» Articles » PMID: 20012599

Antipointing: Perception-based Visual Information Renders an Offline Mode of Control

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20012599
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent work by our group reported that mirror-symmetrical reaching movements (i.e., antipointing) are supported by perception-based visual information (Heath et al. 2009a). The present study was designed to determine if the perception-based visual information supporting antipointing results in a primarily offline mode of control; that is, a mode of control wherein the response unfolds with few-if any-online limb corrections. Participants reached directly to (propointing) or mirror-symmetrical (antipointing) to targets presented in the left and right visual fields. To examine the extent reaches were controlled online versus offline, we computed the proportion of variance (R (2)) explained by the position of the limb at 75% of movement time relative to the response's ultimate movement endpoint. The endpoints for propointing in left and right visual fields demonstrated robust endpoint accuracy and stability and were tied to low R (2) values. In contrast, antipointing elicited a marked degree of endpoint variability and were characterized by a visual-field specific pattern of endpoint bias. Moreover, the R (2) values for antipointing were more robust than propointing counterparts. Therefore, we propose that the metrical visual information supporting stimulus-driven propointing results in a primarily online mode of control whereas the relative nature of the perception-based visual information supporting antipointing results in an offline mode of control. More directly, we propose that the offline control of antipointing is attributed to the "slow" cognitive processing of visuoperceptual networks.

Citing Articles

A 10-min reduction in cerebral blood flow does not alter post-intervention executive function: evidence from lower-body negative pressure.

Van Riesen J, Shirzad M, Edgar C, Tari B, Heath M Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(9):2193-2205.

PMID: 39012475 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06879-8.


Evaluating the efficacy of an iPad® app in determining a single bout of exercise benefit to executive function.

Tari B, Heath M Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(5):2398-2408.

PMID: 34918231 PMC: 8676939. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01735-x.


Goal-directed reaching: the allocentric coding of target location renders an offline mode of control.

Manzone J, Heath M Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(4):1149-1159.

PMID: 29453490 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5205-7.


The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.

Heath M, DeSimone J Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(11):3259-3268.

PMID: 27405998 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4723-4.


Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?.

Carey D, Liddle J Exp Brain Res. 2013; 230(3):323-31.

PMID: 23955102 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3657-3.


References
1.
Praeg E, Esslen M, Lutz K, Jancke L . Neuronal modifications during visuomotor association learning assessed by electric brain tomography. Brain Topogr. 2006; 19(1-2):61-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-006-0013-y. View

2.
Muri R, Buhler R, Heinemann D, Mosimann U, Felblinger J, Schlaepfer T . Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 143(4):426-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1009-9. View

3.
Bremmer F, Kubischik M, Hoffmann K, Krekelberg B . Neural dynamics of saccadic suppression. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(40):12374-83. PMC: 2787621. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2908-09.2009. View

4.
Schmidt R, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank J, Quinn Jr J . Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979; 47(5):415-51. View

5.
Kleiser R, Seitz R, Krekelberg B . Neural correlates of saccadic suppression in humans. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(5):386-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.036. View