» Articles » PMID: 20011615

The Nature-Nurture Debate and Public Policy

Overview
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20011615
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The contentious nature-nurture debate in developmental psychology is poised to reach a rapprochement with contemporary concepts of gene-environment interaction, transaction, and fit. Discoveries over the past decade have revealed how neither genes nor the environment offers a sufficient window into human development. Rather, the most important discoveries have come from unearthing the manner in which the environment alters gene expression (and how genes impose limits on environmental effects), how biology and the environment influence each other across time, and how maximizing gene-environment fit leads to optimal outcomes for children. The manner in which these factors operate in tandem should direct future scholarship, practice, and public policy.

Citing Articles

Genes, environment and sport performance: why the nature-nurture dualism is no longer relevant.

Davids K, Baker J Sports Med. 2007; 37(11):961-80.

PMID: 17953467 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200737110-00004.


Translational science in action: hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems.

Dodge K Dev Psychopathol. 2006; 18(3):791-814.

PMID: 17152401 PMC: 2745254. DOI: 10.1017/s0954579406060391.

References
1.
Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt T, Mill J, Martin J, Craig I . Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science. 2002; 297(5582):851-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1072290. View

2.
Stoolmiller M . Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment in behavior-genetic adoption studies. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(4):392-409. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.392. View

3.
De Bellis M . Developmental traumatology: the psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy. Dev Psychopathol. 2001; 13(3):539-64. DOI: 10.1017/s0954579401003078. View

4.
Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P . Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: and evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Dev. 1991; 62(4):647-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x. View

5.
Mischel W . Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychol Rev. 1973; 80(4):252-83. DOI: 10.1037/h0035002. View