» Articles » PMID: 20011205

Laparoscopic Approaches to Rectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20011205
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven oncologically equivalent to conventional surgery and is now generally agreed to offer patients a reduced length of stay, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmesis. In contrast, acceptance of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer has been much delayed and the enthusiasm of early studies has met considerable skepticism. For rectal cancer, it has been demonstrated that there is considerable variation between surgeons in disease-free survival and local pelvic recurrence after open proctectomy for rectal cancer. These differences are likely to be magnified when the technical challenge of laparoscopy is added to proctectomy. Minimally invasive approaches to rectal cancer need to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes and maintenance or improvement in quality of life. This review will outline the current evidence for laparoscopy as a treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, emphasize the need for standardized approaches among multidisciplinary teams, and highlight the technical details of different laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Citing Articles

Safety with Innovation in Colon and Rectal Robotic Surgery.

Keller D, Jenkins C Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(5):273-279.

PMID: 34504400 PMC: 8416332. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726352.


A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study.

Yu S, Ji Y, Luo T, Xu P, Zhen Z, Deng J BMC Surg. 2021; 21(1):82.

PMID: 33579251 PMC: 7881460. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01085-7.


Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study.

Richards C, Steele S, Lustik M, Gillern S, Lim R, Brady J Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019; 44:39-45.

PMID: 31312442 PMC: 6610645. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.004.


Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Weaver A, Steele S F1000Res. 2016; 5.

PMID: 27746895 PMC: 5040148. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.9389.1.


The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.

Keller D, Pedraza R, Flores-Gonzalez J, LeFave J, Mahmood A, Haas E Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(8):3321-6.

PMID: 26490770 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4605-z.


References
1.
Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F, Berger R, Jauch K . Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46(8):1047-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-7279-5. View

2.
Vorobev G, Shelygin I, Frolov S, Loshinin K, Syshkov O . [Laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer (comparative results of laparoscopic and open abdominal resection)]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2003; (3):36-42. View

3.
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand H, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker S . A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(20):2050-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651. View

4.
Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini A, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Perretta S . Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(10):1530-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. View

5.
Akbari R, Read T . Laparoscopic rectal surgery: rectal cancer, pelvic pouch surgery, and rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 86(4):899-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2006.05.002. View