» Articles » PMID: 20010897

Epidemiology of Peritoneal Dialysis: a Story of Believers and Nonbelievers

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Nephrol
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20010897
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 2008, an estimated 1.77 million patients worldwide received dialysis. Of these patients, 1.58 million were treated with hemodialysis and approximately 190,000 received peritoneal dialyisis. In a global comparison of treatment methods for renal failure, therefore, hemodialysis clearly dominates. In this Review, we compare the epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis with that of hemodialysis and describe some of the major differences in the global utilization of the two dialysis modalities. These differences can largely be explained by a number of nonmedical, mainly economic factors, but also by educational and psychological factors. To reverse the current trends, the implementation of suitable reimbursement strategies for peritoneal dialysis is needed as well as increased investment in the training of young nephrology fellows and in education programs for patients and other non-nephrological health-care providers. To achieve these goals, academic and nonacademic training centers, which often consider peritoneal dialysis to be a low-level priority, must invest in research and training related to peritoneal dialysis.

Citing Articles

Immune-metabolic marker of albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio based prognostic nomogram for patients following peritoneal dialysis.

Ye X, Shao Y, Tang Y, Dong X, Zhu Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1462874.

PMID: 39281816 PMC: 11401073. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1462874.


Uptake and Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Analysis of Registry Data.

Hayat A, Cho Y, Pascoe E, Krishnasamy R, Borlace M, Chen J Kidney Int Rep. 2024; 9(5):1484-1495.

PMID: 38707791 PMC: 11068974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.01.059.


Peritoneal dialysis discontinuation: to the root of the problem.

Piarulli P, Vizzardi V, Alberici F, Riva H, Aramini M, Regusci L J Nephrol. 2023; 36(7):1763-1776.

PMID: 37747660 PMC: 10543152. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01759-w.


Relationship between gut microbiota and nutritional status in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Tian N, Yan Y, Chen N, Xu S, Chu R, Wang M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1572.

PMID: 36709367 PMC: 9884196. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27919-3.


Fibrosis of Peritoneal Membrane as Target of New Therapies in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Masola V, Bonomini M, Borrelli S, Di Liberato L, Vecchi L, Onisto M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(9).

PMID: 35563220 PMC: 9102299. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094831.


References
1.
Kam-Tao Li P, Chow K . Peritoneal dialysis patient selection: characteristics for success. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009; 16(3):160-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2009.02.001. View

2.
Mendelssohn D . Empowerment of patient preference in dialysis modality selection. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43(5):930-2. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.02.007. View

3.
Heaf J, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M . Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002; 17(1):112-7. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.112. View

4.
Nissenson A, Prichard S, Cheng I, Gokal R, Kubota M, Maiorca R . ESRD modality selection into the 21st century: the importance of non medical factors. ASAIO J. 1997; 43(3):143-50. View

5.
Vazelov E, Krivoshiev S, Antonov S, Lazarov G . End-stage renal disease and peritoneal dialysis in Bulgaria. Perit Dial Int. 2004; 24(6):512-7. View