» Articles » PMID: 19997937

The Endoscopic U-stitch Technique for Primary Button Placement: an Institution's Experience

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 Dec 10
PMID 19997937
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Various gastrostomy tube placement techniques have been reported in the literature. The endoscopic U-stitch technique allows for primary button placement without the need for laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to quantify the completion rate and the occurrence of complications with this procedure at one academic teaching hospital.

Methods: All gastrostomy procedures between February 2001 and September 2008 were reviewed. Data were collected from paper and electronic records for endoscopic U-stitch procedures.

Results: Endoscopic U-stitch gastrostomies were attempted in 121 patients, with primary button placement in 115 (95%) and conversion to an open procedure in 6. No procedure-related deaths occurred, and 7% of patients experienced postoperative complications that included hematemesis, cellulitis, colonic perforation, granulation tissue requiring operative excision, and surgical fistula closure. Average operative time was 18 min.

Conclusion: The endoscopic U-stitch technique is safe and allows for primary button placement in infants and children. Its complication rate compares favorably with other laparoscopic and open techniques described in the literature.

Citing Articles

A Novel Vesicoscopic Bladder Wall Suture Fixation Technique to Aid Endoscopic Vesicostomy Button Insertion.

Adam A, Sookram J Curr Urol. 2018; 11(3):157-162.

PMID: 29692696 PMC: 5903469. DOI: 10.1159/000447211.


Endoscopic gastrostomy button with double-lasso U-stitch in children.

Seifarth F, Dong M, Guerron A, Lozada J, Magnuson D JSLS. 2015; 19(1):e2015.00002.

PMID: 25848198 PMC: 4379868. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00002.


Modified laparoendoscopic gastrostomy tube (LEGT) placement.

Hassan S, Pimpalwar A Pediatr Surg Int. 2011; 27(11):1249-54.

PMID: 21947136 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-011-2977-2.

References
1.
Kimber C, Beasley S . Limitations of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in facilitating enteral nutrition in children: review of the shortcomings of a new technique. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999; 35(5):427-31. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1999.355418.x. View

2.
Lotan G, Broide E, Efrati Y, Klin B . Laparoscopically monitored percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children: a safer procedure. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(8):1280-2. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9071-8. View

3.
Zamakhshary M, Jamal M, Blair G, Murphy J, Webber E, Skarsgard E . Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard?. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(5):859-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.02.001. View

4.
Rothenberg S, Bealer J, Chang J . Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes. A safer and simpler technique. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(10):995-7. DOI: 10.1007/s004649901154. View

5.
Terry N, BOSWELL W, Carney D, Beck A, Lowe L, Rittmeyer C . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-bar fixation in children and infants. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(1):167-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9402-x. View