» Articles » PMID: 1999461

Multilayering and Loss of Apical Polarity in MDCK Cells Transformed with Viral K-ras

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1991 Mar 1
PMID 1999461
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of viral Kirsten ras oncogene expression on the polarized phenotype of MDCK cells were investigated. Stable transformed MDCK cell lines expressing the v-K-ras oncogene were generated via infection with a helper-independent retroviral vector construct. When grown on plastic substrata, transformed cells formed continuous monolayers with epithelial-like morphology. However, on permeable filter supports where normal cells form highly polarized monolayers, transformed MDCK cells detached from the substratum and developed multilayers. Morphological analysis of the multilayers revealed that oncogene expression perturbed the polarized organization of MDCK cells such that the transformed cells lacked an apical--basal axis around which the cytoplasm is normally organized. Evidence for selective disruption of apical membrane polarity was provided by immunolocalization of membrane proteins; a normally apical 114-kD protein was randomly distributed on the cell surface in the transformed cell line, whereas normally basolateral proteins remained exclusively localized to areas of cell contact and did not appear on the free cell surface. The discrete distribution of the tight junction-associated ZO-1 protein as well as transepithelial resistance and flux measurements suggested that tight junctions were also assembled. These findings indicate that v-K-ras transformation alters cell-substratum and cell-cell interactions in MDCK cells. Furthermore, v-K-ras expression perturbs apical polarization but does not interfere with the development of a basolateral domain, suggesting that apical and basolateral polarity in epithelial cells may be regulated independently.

Citing Articles

A neuroligin-2-YAP axis regulates progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Middonti E, Astanina E, Vallariello E, Hoza R, Metovic J, Spadi R EMBO Rep. 2024; 25(4):1886-1908.

PMID: 38413734 PMC: 11014856. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00104-x.


A novel tool for the unbiased characterization of epithelial monolayer development in culture.

Dawney N, Cammarota C, Jia Q, Shipley A, Glichowski J, Vasandani M Mol Biol Cell. 2023; 34(4):ar25.

PMID: 36696175 PMC: 10092640. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E22-04-0121.


Generation of anisotropic strain dysregulates wild-type cell division at the interface between host and oncogenic tissue.

Moruzzi M, Nestor-Bergmann A, Goddard G, Tarannum N, Brennan K, Woolner S Curr Biol. 2021; 31(15):3409-3418.e6.

PMID: 34111402 PMC: 8360906. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.023.


pHLARE: a new biosensor reveals decreased lysosome pH in cancer cells.

Webb B, Aloisio F, Charafeddine R, Cook J, Wittmann T, Barber D Mol Biol Cell. 2020; 32(2):131-142.

PMID: 33237838 PMC: 8120692. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-06-0383.


E7 oncoprotein from human papillomavirus 16 alters claudins expression and the sealing of epithelial tight junctions.

Uc P, Miranda J, Raya-Sandino A, Alarcon L, Roldan M, Ocadiz-Delgado R Int J Oncol. 2020; 57(4):905-924.

PMID: 32945372 PMC: 7473757. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5105.


References
1.
Redmond S, Reichmann E, Muller R, Friis R, Groner B, Hynes N . The transformation of primary and established mouse mammary epithelial cells by p21-ras is concentration dependent. Oncogene. 1988; 2(3):259-65. View

2.
Farquhar M, Palade G . Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1963; 17:375-412. PMC: 2106201. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.375. View

3.
Bramhall S, Noack N, Wu M, Loewenberg J . A simple colorimetric method for determination of protein. Anal Biochem. 1969; 31(1):146-8. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90251-6. View

4.
Laemmli U . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0. View

5.
Graham F, Van Der Eb A . A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology. 1973; 52(2):456-67. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3. View