» Articles » PMID: 19956599

Why Some Women Look Young for Their Age

Abstract

The desire of many to look young for their age has led to the establishment of a large cosmetics industry. However, the features of appearance that primarily determine how old women look for their age and whether genetic or environmental factors predominately influence such features are largely unknown. We studied the facial appearance of 102 pairs of female Danish twins aged 59 to 81 as well as 162 British females aged 45 to 75. Skin wrinkling, hair graying and lip height were significantly and independently associated with how old the women looked for their age. The appearance of facial sun-damage was also found to be significantly correlated to how old women look for their age and was primarily due to its commonality with the appearance of skin wrinkles. There was also considerable variation in the perceived age data that was unaccounted for. Composite facial images created from women who looked young or old for their age indicated that the structure of subcutaneous tissue was partly responsible. Heritability analyses of the appearance features revealed that perceived age, pigmented age spots, skin wrinkles and the appearance of sun-damage were influenced more or less equally by genetic and environmental factors. Hair graying, recession of hair from the forehead and lip height were influenced mainly by genetic factors whereas environmental factors influenced hair thinning. These findings indicate that women who look young for their age have large lips, avoid sun-exposure and possess genetic factors that protect against the development of gray hair and skin wrinkles. The findings also demonstrate that perceived age is a better biomarker of skin, hair and facial aging than chronological age.

Citing Articles

[The impact of diabetes on aesthetic procedures].

Fritz K, Salavastru C, Eren S, Tiplica G Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2024; 76(1):15-20.

PMID: 39641792 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-024-05443-3.


Perceived age estimation from facial image and demographic data in young and middle-aged South Korean adults.

Ahn I, Baek Y, Seo B, Lim S, Jung K, Kim H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30084.

PMID: 39627298 PMC: 11615210. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78695-7.


Epigenetics and ultraviolet radiation: Implications for skin ageing and carcinogenesis.

Barnes B, Shyne A, Gunn D, Griffiths C, Watson R Skin Health Dis. 2024; 4(6):e410.

PMID: 39624739 PMC: 11608893. DOI: 10.1002/ski2.410.


Deep learning predicted perceived age is a reliable approach for analysis of facial ageing: A proof of principle study.

Turner C, Pardo L, Gunn D, Zillmer R, Mekic S, Liu F J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024; 38(12):2295-2302.

PMID: 39360788 PMC: 11587682. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20365.


The Characteristics and Inheriting Pattern of Skin Aging in Chinese Women: An Intergenerational Study of Mothers and Daughters.

Zhang Z, Shi M, Li J, Chen D, Ren J, Li Z Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024; 17:1773-1782.

PMID: 39132029 PMC: 11315646. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S468477.


References
1.
Griffiths C, Wang T, Hamilton T, Voorhees J, Ellis C . A photonumeric scale for the assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol. 1992; 128(3):347-51. View

2.
Patriarca M, Goldman K, Santos J, Petri V, Simoes R, Soares Jr J . Effects of topical estradiol on the facial skin collagen of postmenopausal women under oral hormone therapy: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 130(2):202-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.024. View

3.
Leveque J, Goubanova E . Influence of age on the lips and perioral skin. Dermatology. 2004; 208(4):307-13. DOI: 10.1159/000077838. View

4.
Griffiths C . The clinical identification and quantification of photodamage. Br J Dermatol. 1992; 127 Suppl 41:37-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb16986.x. View

5.
Nyholt D, Gillespie N, Heath A, Martin N . Genetic basis of male pattern baldness. J Invest Dermatol. 2003; 121(6):1561-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1747.2003.12615.x. View